Jump to content

Two S-hypotheses (Sorokin’s hypothesis)


Recommended Posts

I advance two similar S-hypotheses (“Sorokin’s hypothesis”).

 

S-hypothesis-1 (confirmed by concrete calculations on the computer):

In the equality [math]A^{n^t}+B^{n^t}=(A^{n^{t-1}}+B^{n^{t-1}})R[/math], where

- prime n> 2,

- integers A and B are relatively prime,

(t-1)-digit end of each prime divider of the number R (excluding n) in the base n is equal to 1.

For example (for n=3): [math]8^3-1=(8-1)*73=(8-1)*(8*9+1) [/math]; [math]8^3+1=(8+1)*57=(8+1)*(3*19)=(8+1)*[3*(2*9+1][/math]; and so forth.

 

S-hypothesis-2 (more questionable):

In the equality [math]A^n+B^n=(A+B)R[/math], where

- prime n> 2,

- integers A and B are relatively prime,

- their k-digit ends are the k- digit ends of some numbers of a^n and b^n,

- the k-digit end of the number R is equal to 1,

the k-digit end of each prime divider of the number R (excluding n) in the base n is equal to 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Theorem about the dividers (Sorokin’s theorem)

 

If integers A, B and A-B are relatively prime and not multiple prime n>2, and the t-digits end of the number R in the equality [math]A^n-B^n=(A-B)R[/math] in the base n is equal to 1,

then the t-digits end of of each prime divider m of the number R is also equal to 1.

 

Proof consists of several theorems.


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

I approach the publication of strict proofs of theorems.

 

Theorem 1.

 

If integers A, B and A-B are relatively prime and are not multiple by prime n>2, then the last digit of each prime divider m of the number R in the equality [math]A^n-B^n=(A-B)R[/math] is equal to 1 in the base n.

 

Proof.

 

It is known that under theorem conditions the number R is not divided by n and numbers A-B and R have no common divider.

 

Let us show now that also the prime number q of the form of [math]q=p+1[/math], where p is not divided by n, is the divider of the number [math]A^n-B^n[/math] and is not the divider of the number R.

 

According to Fermat's little theorem, number [math]A^p-B^p[/math] is divided by q.

 

It is utilized the solution of the following linear diophantine equation: nx-py=1[/math].

 

The number [math]A^ {nx}-B^ {nx}[/math] is divided by m. But [math]A^{nx}-B^{nx}=A^{py+1}-B^{py+1}=(A^p)^y-(B^p)^y[/math], where the numbers [math]A^p[/math] and [math]B^p[/math] have (according to Fermat's little theorem) last digit equal to 1. Consequently, the number A-B is divided, but the number R is not divided by q.

 

Thus, the numbers of form [math]q=p+1[/math], where p is not divided by n, are not the dividers of the number R. QED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.