yet another tin pot bbt lol

[danny burton]

abstract

 

yet another big bang theory. nuff said.

 

 

proposal

 

the universe is expressed by, or an expression of, pure number: it’s counting upwards from 1, or counting increasingly smaller fractions of 1.

 

or: the universe is an expression of the number count we represent in standard English as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13... all the way through to 10to the power 40960000000000000000000 or whatever number we’d be at now if time was just an upward count from 1, or a downward count from derived from 1 being divided into increasingly finer fractions.

 

 

the universe is expressing or an expression of the numbers 1 to ∞-1

 

 

Universe/Time = 1/(∞-1)

 

 

 

 

further

 

space, energy and mass are emergent properties of the pattern coding potential of high count numbers – 10 to many powers at a guess.

 

this pattern encoding is expressed at higher magnitude powers of number in objects interacting through a polydimensional space

 

 

testing

 

if the hypothesis is correct, there should be correlations between:

 

a) data encoding potential of number at increasingly higher counts

 

and

 

b) high energy proto-particle interactions and anomolies at such experiments are being conducted at the LHC.

 

specifically there would be anomolies indicating that the size ratio between us and early particles was slowly changing over time.

 

i predict that the smallest particles would very slowly be getting bigger, relative to us over time, as we both became smaller relative to the universe at different rates.

 

the rate at which our size changes relative to protoparticles will be a function of the rate of expansion of the universe.

 

 

references

 

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lloyd2/lloyd2_p2.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

---

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

So why not?

 

 

The universe is 1 thing.

 

At the instant of the big bang the only bit of data available is: universe = 1

 

There hadn’t been enough time to express any greater complexity

 

If time divides the universe into 2 discreet sets (the bit that is here now and the bit that is here then) then the potential complexity is doubled.

 

The more the universe is divided by time, the more complexity it is possible to express.

 

Dimensions become possible, even necessary, as ways for the fractions of the universe to interact as they are separated (they must retain their 1 whole, or it ain’t the universe is it?)

 

As the universe divides into finer and finer fractions, it becomes increasingly possible for the fractions to interact in increasingly complex patterns

 

Dimensions emerge [technical term lol] as a result of the increasing complexity

 

Sets of fractions group together, finding efficiency in behaving as discreet sets within larger sets.

 

The fundamental interactions emerge

 

U/t = 1/(∞-1)

 

U = Universe, sum of existence

 

t = total time quanta that have ‘elapsed’ since big bang

 

(∞-1) = right now. The total set of natural numbers it is possible to have described in the time between the big bang and now.

 

Don’t forget – infinity’s right in front of us (and if you don’t believe me... come back tomorrow lol).

 

So reality is infinity (potential, or possibility) minus 1 (quanta of time)

 

 

_____________

 

 

One of the implications if the theory’s correct... is that our universe began when something crossed the event horizon of a black hole.

 

_____________

 

[the reference in the first post to seth lloyd is an example of the data potential in the universe, although he used Hydrogen atoms as minimum data bearing points and this idea says that every single co-ordinate in a single dimension is a data point.]

Edited March 12, 2010 by danny burton
Consecutive posts merged.