Jump to content

How well Icefire did on the following categories?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. How well Icefire did on the following categories?

    • Accuracy/longevity: (2)
    • Accuracy/longevity: (3)
      0
    • Accuracy/longevity: (4)
      0
    • Accuracy/longevity: (5)
      0
    • Standalone: (2)
    • Standalone: (3)
      0
    • Standalone: (4)
    • Standalone: (5)
      0
    • Brief/challenging: (2)
    • Brief/challenging: (3)
      0
    • Brief/challenging: (4)
    • Brief/challenging: (5)
      0
    • Obvious: (2)
    • Obvious: (3)
    • Obvious: (4)
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

There's not enough room to put four vote options on the last category, so if you want to vote a "5" for it, just pick both "3" and "2" :)

 

Also (since there wasn't room), I left out the choice for voting a "1". So if you think it's worth a "1", simply don't vote for a category and it'll be worth a "1".

 

 

 

Entry #2.

 

Photon...

 

A minute body of mass that maintains its velocity and a constant rate of periodic motion. When it collides with a mass it will be either absorbed, reflected, or pass through the object with an altered velocity depending on the form of the mass.

 

 

 

The criteria explained.

 

Accuracy/longevity. Definition is universal, and timeless, covering any future scenarios we imagine today.

 

Standalone. It avoided using the word's synonym, antonym, or thesaurus friends. i.e. a) an emotion wasn't defined using a substitute feeling or very related word; b) "hot" wasn't defined as a lack of cold.

 

Also didn't need cheap partner or reference words. i.e. to define "alphabet" it didn't use "letters" or "symbols"; to define "language" it didn't use "words" or "communication".

 

Brief/challenging.

a) Shorter than 50 words, but not too short. -1 point for each 10 words over 40.

 

b) It's also pretty challenging to define in words. i.e. an experience.

 

Obvious. The definition is clearly for the word "___", it'll rarely get confused for another word.


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

Icefire's entry...

 

Accuracy/longevity. (2) The mass part inaccurate, yet it does have a bit of potential for a universal definition.

 

Standalone. (4) Almost, but it used "constant rate" which sort of gives it away.

 

Brief/challenging. (4) Less than 50 words, although it was fairly close to the 50 words -- but it's definitely challenging, though I didn't subtract points for the "constant rate" bit.

 

Obvious. (3) Good except for the mass a photon doesn't have. :)

 

Total = 13 (of 20) Nice.

 

 

I'm probably going to move "challenging" over with "standalone" before the next entry.

 

Continue voting.

Edited by The Bear's Key
Consecutive posts merged.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.