Jump to content

Was fire unsubstantial without oxygen?


Jerryt12

Recommended Posts

thanks for all the replies, but what I don't understand was why was oxygen needed in order to start a fire? (sorry, I should be more specific.)


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

From Mr. Skeptic, I can conclude that it's because oxygen is a type of oxidizers. But doesn't oxidizers help releases electrons from others substances? How does that helps make a fire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way it works is that (almost always) forming chemical bonds releases energy. Forming stronger bonds releases more energy than forming weaker bonds, and also trading a weak bond for a strong bond releases energy.

 

The rules governing what makes a strong and weak bond are rather complicated, but in general if you combine a highly electronegative atom (an oxidizer; one toward the top left of the periodic table) with a significantly less electronegative atom (almost all of them) then you get a fairly strong bond. Oxygen is actually the second most electronegative atom (beat only by fluorine) and is highly abundant, making up 21% of our atmosphere.

 

As you might know, heat usually speeds up chemical reactions (more particle collisions and they are more likely to overcome the activation energy). Burning is a chemical reaction that releases heat, and in a sense is therefore self-catalyzing. That is why paper doesn't burst into flames in the atmosphere but will burn nicely once you put a lit match to it.

 

Burning does not require a flame. A flame will occur if there are volatile constituents, such as hydrocarbons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the flame is not due to the carbon but due to the volatiles contained. If you burn coke (coal roasted to remove the volatiles), you will get little or no flame. If you burn hydrogen you will get a flame without involving carbon. The heat produced is the energy that is released by forming more or stronger bonds.

 

Almost all chemical reactions will produce heat, especially ones that happen spontaneously. I'm not sure what the exact requirement is to consider it a fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Volatiles are substances that evaporate easily. For the purposes of a flame, anything that has a boiling point lower than the temperature of the fire, will evaporate. If it is flammable, it will both evaporate and burn (so form a flame).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that the properties of a substance depends on their electron configuration.

 

So how would we know if a substance is volatile by looking at their electron configuration?


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

so if we're burning woods, is oxygen the volatile substance that start the fire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wood contains lots of hydrocarbons (cellulose is essentially a chain of glucose sugars). The heat can get these to react and form something volatile. Wood is largely made of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Some of the carbon can form volatile substances (methane, ethane, alcohols, carbon monoxide, ...) by combining with the hydrogen and oxygen, and some remains as charcoal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolysis#Fire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.