Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

the original idea behind this work was to present the basic outline of blackhole formation and then to try filling in the pieces.

 

the basic outline is :

 

chaotic collapse of stellar mass initiates the process.

spatial contraction is the last stage of blackhole formation.

in between, mass is converted to energy.

the analogy is to nuclear explosion, an implosion detonates an

explosion. for a blackhole, spatial contraction further implodes this.

 

this seems to be the basic outline for blackhole formation.

 

gravity waves as initiators, energy bonding of waves and saturation points of light have been offered as possibilities to fill in the missing pieces.

 

my question is this, is the 3 -step basic outline valid?

Posted

to clarify, the gravitational-wave singularity refers to the initial conditions during the final collapse to a blackhole.

by definition, a gravity field in fluctuation produces a gravity-wave.

a collapsing star will then produce a physical gravity-wave travelling through matter. the matter is moving inward.

the point here is our understanding of blackhole collapse. it is more of an argument against excluding or, worse, ignoring, the defined fact that a gravity-wave is an integral part of colloapsing a star to a blackhole.

...and lamenting that science has not yet incorporated this information to the current model.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.