hewj11 Posted April 14, 2010 Posted April 14, 2010 this has prob been answered someplace in this forum but didn't search it. But in E=mc^2 why do you need to have the speed of light in the equation? How come its not just the exchange energy is matter an vice versa? Thanks
Mr Skeptic Posted April 14, 2010 Posted April 14, 2010 It's a conversion factor, just like 1 kilometer * 1000 meters/kilometer = 1000 meters, a formula for turning one measure of distance into another measure of distance.
toastywombel Posted April 14, 2010 Posted April 14, 2010 this has prob been answered someplace in this forum but didn't search it. But in E=mc^2 why do you need to have the speed of light in the equation? How come its not just the exchange energy is matter an vice versa? Thanks As skeptic said, it is just the conversion of mass (m) into energy (E). Want the conversion for energy (E) to mass? Just solve the equation for mass (m). m=E/c^2
PaulS1950 Posted April 16, 2010 Posted April 16, 2010 I do a little work with kinetic energy in external ballistics of small projectiles and the formula for the energy of a projectile is the same. E = MV^2 It is just that mass has to be accelerated to the speed of light to convert all its mass to energy (something to do with the velocity required to break apart the atom?). I just assumed that the speed of light was the probable reaction velocity. so instead of V^2 it is C^2. It is still velocity squared but the velocity is a constant instead of a variable. Does that make sense to anyone but me?
Mr Skeptic Posted April 16, 2010 Posted April 16, 2010 I do a little work with kinetic energy in external ballistics of small projectiles and the formula for the energy of a projectile is the same.E = MV^2 You forgot the 1/2. It's E = (1/2) MV^2 for kinetic energy at non-relativistic speeds. It is just that mass has to be accelerated to the speed of light to convert all its mass to energy (something to do with the velocity required to break apart the atom?). Nothing with mass can be accelerated to the speed of light, because it would require infinite energy to do so. Nothing without mass can travel slower than the speed of light, because otherwise its energy would be zero.
PaulS1950 Posted April 16, 2010 Posted April 16, 2010 I always forget that 1/2. The spreadsheet converts weight in pounds to mass and does the division in one step: W / g / 2 where W is weight in pounds and g = acceleration of gravity You are right, of course, and I should have worded it that the reactions within atoms occur at the speed of light. I understand the principal even if I can't describe it perfectly. A lot of things in my world are OK when they are "close enough".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now