Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Because the notion that gravity only affects massive objects is a Newtonian one, but a better description of gravity is General Relativity. In that, gravity is due to/manifests itself as the curvature of space.

Posted

And in any case you can consider photons to have (relativistic) mass since they have momentum and energy. Their rest mass is zero, however.

Posted
And in any case you can consider photons to have (relativistic) mass since they have momentum and energy. Their rest mass is zero, however.

 

I do not think that relativistic mass is a useful concept in this situation.

 

As swansont has stated, gravity is best thought of a the local geometry of space-time. In particular, that geometry need not be flat.

 

Now it turns out that photons travel along the next best thing to a straight line on a space-time: a null geodesic. To be a little more careful, we are thinking of photons as test particles, that is they do not effect the space-time themselves.

 

The energy-momentum is what acts as a source of gravity. Although photons are massless they carry energy-momentum and can act as a source of gravity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.