Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by Adam It will be visible to amateur astronomers. You will see for yourself. Does this look familiar? http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03m.htm
Adam Posted January 25, 2003 Author Posted January 25, 2003 sorry buddy , i don't need to win an argument by using elaborate vocabulary, to make myself seem smarter , Find yourself another thread, this is a 1 on 1 argument.
Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 A 1 on 1 argument? The only way you're going to win this is if you keep ignoring the science behind why you are wrong - much like you have been doing all along. As long as you use that strategy it doesn't matter how many people post here in this public discussion.
JaKiri Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by Adam sorry buddy , i don't need to win an argument by using elaborate vocabulary, to make myself seem smarter , Find yourself another thread, this is a 1 on 1 argument. If you want a 1 on 1 argument, take it to PM. Otherwise, don't bother coming to message boards. You also appear to have mistaken my suggestion that you make your posts a bit more readable for me saying 'hes stupid lolz he doesnt use words like peptonize lolz'
Adam Posted January 25, 2003 Author Posted January 25, 2003 Other people here don't matter to me, I will continue this until APRIL.
Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by Adam Other people here don't matter to me, I will continue this until APRIL. Well, that remains to be seen. What I suggest is that you post your theory again in this thread, but this time all in one ordered and structured form, making any modifications you see fit based on what we've already talked about. Kind of a summary. That way we will all know where we've got to - it'll make the discussion a lot easier.
Adam Posted January 25, 2003 Author Posted January 25, 2003 Not my theory, But i well support it. http://www.zetatalk.com a cult, Just kidding NOT.
Radical Edward Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Adam... will you answer my damn points?
Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by Radical Edward Adam... will you answer my damn points? Of course he won't. Check out this page from one of the sites he's been using as a "Source": http://www.poleshiftprepare.com/survivalgroups.htm Apparently sitting in a tent somewhere high up keeps you safe from the solar radiation and firestorms caused by a polar shift. I didn't know that.
Adam Posted January 25, 2003 Author Posted January 25, 2003 i haven't been using that site, i have been using zetatalk.com stop hitting on search engines ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
Adam Posted January 25, 2003 Author Posted January 25, 2003 Sayonara, come up with something that no one else has figured out discovered before, Then I'l look at you from respecting point of view
Radical Edward Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 are you going to reply to me adam, or not?
Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by Adam Ofcourse , this is united states government biggest secret, and Faf doesn't like it. Originally posted by Adam i haven't been using that site, i have been using zetatalk.com stop hitting on search engines And the source of the image? Why, it's http://www.poleshiftprepare.com/px_orbit.GIF You, Sir, are a liar. So don't speak to me about respect.
Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by Adam Sayonara, come up with something that no one else has figured out discovered before, Then I'l look at you from respecting point of view I respect people who understand and apply scientific principles, and who use that to back up their claims. Unfortunately this precludes you.
fafalone Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 If we can see pluto without infrared I'm sure we could see something the size of jupiter out there...
Radical Edward Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 faf, you haven't seen the explanation they give..... furthermore, you don't want to.
fafalone Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Are you defending that moron? The reason he gave was it's too far away, and I said that's bs.
Radical Edward Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone Are you defending that moron? The reason he gave was it's too far away, and I said that's bs. I'm not no... they have this 'exponential speed gain' thing and some deflection.... whichever, it's all bollocks.
fafalone Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Yeah, planets don't exponentially gain speed no matter how eccentric their orbit. And even if they did, you would still be able to see them with an optical telescope.
Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by Adam :zzz: If you're bored, why not go somewhere where they don't insist on being scientific all the time.
Sayonara Posted January 25, 2003 Posted January 25, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone Yeah, planets don't exponentially gain speed no matter how eccentric their orbit. And even if they did, you would still be able to see them with an optical telescope. Regardless of which, the orbit described in the image Adam posted would need to be highly exotic, describing a pattern such as that which might be achieved with a spirograph as the orbit of the planet followed Earth's own trajectory. Why this planet should orbit both Earth and the sun requires, I suspect, some very nimble reasoning.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now