Solar activity VS Seismic activity

[Yomomma]

SEISMO- ELECTROMAGNETICS

*

Over the past 5 months there has been an increase in solar activity thus an increase in seismic activity, such as the earthquakes in Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Haiti, Chile, Turkey, and China and the volcanic eruption in Iceland. NASA’s STEREO program has been monitoring solar activity and has observed a significant amount of solar phenomenon. All of these earthquakes occurred in locations closest to the edges of the tectonic plates. Solar activity has a direct relationship on seismic activity. Think of a solar wind as a stream of plasma or energy hitting the Earth’s magnetic field for a period of 2-3 days. Granted, there has been solar phenomenon throughout the existence of our solar system, and seismic activity as well. The point is the two go hand in hand and solar activity has a direct effect on the planet’s tectonic plate movement. It is basically the driving force for the tectonic plates. As a result Earth’s core temperature gradually increases. This increase in the Earth’s core temperature causes the core to expand, thus causing Earth’s crust to be pushed outward and tectonic plates to move all at once, moving easier due to the hotter surface underneath it. As a result you see fissures created, earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanoes erupting. A simple analogy would be to compare the planet to a space ship protected by a force field. When plasma blasts are fired at the shield, the field generator heats up. If too much plasma blast is fired at the ship, the generator over heats and the ship is vulnerable to exposure to plasma blasts. This same analogy could be applied to the planet, but the planet’s generator does not cease to function. It just overheats. As a result of the core overheating it causes earthquakes. A simple calorimetry equation could be applied to this to explain how energy causes temperatures to rise.

 

CALORIMETRY EQUATION:

Q= mc∆T where

Q= energy (kilojoules)

m = mass (g)

c= specific heat capacity* (joules/ grams x Kelvin)

∆T= change in temperature (final Temperature- initial Temperature)

 

The specific heat capacity of a substance is defined as the energy/temperature required raising the temperature of a substance by one Kelvin. Thus you can use this equation to determine the amount of energy created to cause a specific mass to raise it’s internal temperature by knowing the mass of the substance (m) multiplied by the specific heat capacity © multiplied by the Final temperature of the substance – the initial= ∆T or change in temperature. You can translate this equation by saying energy is created due to a change in temperature, and a change in temperature creates energy. (Q=∆T or ∆T=Q). You can expand on this equation and apply it to the planet and create a new equation.

 

This equation has not been published but it is based on A New Theory of Magnetic Storms (WIKIPEDIA). This theory sought to explain the phenomenon of geomagnetic storms. It is now understood that the Sun continually emits plasma in the solar wind and that this phenomenon is amplified whenever solar flares occur. I based this equation on the theory of which Earth’s magnetic shield is created. Earth’s magnetic shield is created by a constant amount of energy (the core) spinning so fast that its energy has no where else to go but outside of the container of which it is contained in, in the form of electromagnetic energy. Earth’s velocity of rotation is held constant because in space once an object is set in motion it stays in motion. Earth’s core energy is maintained by a constant/ adequate amount of energy emitted from the sun in the form of plasma that maintains the high temperature of the Earth’s core.

 

EXPANDING FROM THE CALORIMETRY EQUATION TO APPLY IT TO THE PLANET’S PRODUCTION OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD:

In order for this equation to work I have to add some factors into the equation to account for how the Earth’s magnetic shield is made. I add factors of the speed at which the planet is rotating, stable temperature to produce an electromagnetic shield, and the amount of energy exerted from the sun in the form of plasma.

 

I call this equation EC equation after my initials and it stands for Earth Calorimetry

 

(-P)+[Q= MCS( T+P)] where

 

Q= energy of the magnetic field

P= the energy in the form of plasma expelled from the sun

M= mass of the planet

C= the specific heat capacity of the core

S= the speed of rotation (velocity)

T= the stable temperature of the core to produce the electromagnetic field

 

Where P has a direct relationship on maintaining a stable T (in temperature/ energy) spinning at S (velocity) to project energy outward in the form of an electromagnetic energy. However P (plasma energy) diminishes Q, but at the same time it adds to the internal temperature (T) to produce Q. This is called the exchange of energy from electromagnetic shield to the core, thus in order to maintain a stable T and a strong Q, P<Q (the energy exerted from plasma has to be weaker than the electromagnetic shield). Plasma energy from the sun is necessary in maintaining our magnetic shield, but in an adequate amount. If P increases, then T increases because T is positively affected by the energy from plasma and Q becomes weaker because it is negatively affected by plasma. Thus when P= a higher amount of energy that is needed from solar phenomenon such as solar flares and strong solar winds, the core heats up and expands due to an increase in temperature, and causes all tectonic plates to move and volcanoes to erupt. Collisions between two or more plates cause earthquakes and if it’s in the ocean tsunamis occur.

 

DETERMINING THE DISTANCE OF WHICH EACH TECTONIC PLATE MOVES:

*

To determine the distance of which each tectonic plate moves you can use the right side of the top equation.

 

MCS(T+P)= Energy required to make the electromagnetic field or EME

 

You use this value to make this equation:

 

EME/ the mass of one tectonic plate by an amount of distance multiplied by energy necessary to move it.

 

or

 

EME divided by (mass of one tectonic plate (m) divided by x amount of distance(d) multiplied by energy(e)

 

EME/ (m/d x e)= distance of which the plate travels

*

Each distance of which each plate travels will be different because each plate has a different mass.

*

DETERMINING THE MAGNITUDE OF THE EARTHQUAKE:

*

To determine magnitude you have to know which direction each plate is traveling and its velocity.

 

Velocity= distance/time

*

To determine velocity you have to determine the amount of energy exerted on the magnetic shield per the amount of time, thus you will know the distance per amount of time.

 

When you determine which way the plates moves you can find the magnitude of impact between two plates by knowing the mass of the heavier plate multiplied by its velocity by the mass of the lighter plate multiplied by its velocity.

 

(Greater Value =Mass of plate A (MA) x velocity) divided by (Lesser Value = Mass of plate B (MB) x velocity) = The magnitude of impact.

 

or

*

(MA x VA)= MAV

(MB x VB)= MBV

*

If MAV>MBV then

MAV/MBV= Magnitude of impact.

*

If MBV>MAV then

MBV/MAV= Magnitude of impact.

 

Over the next two years the planet will be at risk of a higher amount of solar phenomenon (strong solar winds and solar flares), in terms of frequency of event, magnitude of event, and duration time of each event. This period is called a solar maximum. The solar maximum is believed to be caused by a smaller gravitational force affecting the mass of a larger object in space. This gravitational force is believed to be caused by the mass of a brown dwarf beyond the Oort cloud or the mass of the center of our solar system’s universe. This mass is believed to cause the perturbing orbits of our gas giants thus the gravitational pull of this mass has to be greater than the gas giants but less than our sun.

(Gas giants < Mass of object causing the solar phenomenon < Mass of our sun) or

(G < MOSP < S)

The same way in which the moon affects our planet (the tides of the ocean), this lesser gravitational force of attraction affects the tides of our sun. When it is high tide, it produces an abundant amount of solar phenomenon. There are 3 scenarios during a solar maximum classified by the amount of energy expelled from the sun. These 3 levels of risk factors also depend on the frequency of phenomenon, magnitude of phenomenon, and duration time of each phenomenon.

*

LOW RISK FACTOR- The amount of energy supplied by each solar phenomenon is enough energy to raise the temperature of the core to cause earthquakes ranging from 6.0- 10.0, causing volcanic eruption, fissure formations, and tsunamis.

*

INTERMEDIATE RISK FACTOR- The amount of energy supplied by each solar phenomenon is enough energy to significantly raise the temperature of the core to cause earthquakes ranging from 6.0- 14.0, causing an abundant amount of volcanic eruptions, an abundant amount of fissure formations, and mega tsunamis. The aftermath of the volcanic eruptions will cast the entire planet into a nuclear winter due to the ash in the atmosphere. Global climates will plummet, destroying all agriculture and creating global famine. Humanity could see a significant reduction in population due to fatalities of such events as well as the aftermath.

*

HIGH RISK FACTOR- The amount of energy supplied by each solar phenomenon is so significant and perpetual that the core temperature continuously rises and “OVERHEATS” causing an abundant amount of high magnitude earthquakes, mega tsunamis, and super volcanic eruptions world wide. The amount of energy would be so significant that the magnetic shied is so damaged that it is not repairable. As a result of the core overheating, the iron/nickel alloy that makes up the core is omitted by an abundant amount of volcanic eruptions, thus covering the planet in iron/ nickel alloy. The aftermath of such event would be extinction of life on Earth. Thousands of years later the iron/ nickel alloy will oxidize and create rust and the electromagnetic shield will be weak. The planet will basically be dead. I believe this is what happened to Mars. Mars was once a planet like ours, but an abundant amount of energy killed the planet.

*

APPLYING THE STUDY OF SEISMO-ELECTROMAGNETICS TO CREATE NEW TECHNOLOGIES:

*

If the upcoming chain of events from the solar maximum is of low risk, the aftermath of such events will allow humanity to continue. This study and equation could be very valuable information in the development of new technologies. We could in a sense replicate this complex process of nature. We could create a smaller yet proportional in size model of the planet. This model’s core will consist of and iron/ nickel alloy, followed by layers of material that mimics the layers of our planet. In order to create the energy necessary to start the heat of the core we would have to have a nano-atomic bomb, to generate a significant amount of energy. We would also have to have enough energy to create the right amount of velocity necessary to produce the energy outside of its container. Once this is achieved we could harness the thermal energy of this process of creating this electric magnetic field to maintain its velocity. We would also have to apply an electromagnetic current to maintain the adequate temperature/ energy of the core to produce the electromagnetic shield. We could also harness the thermal energy of this process to produce electricity.

*

*

*

YOU CAN FOLLOW ALONG AND SEE THIS RELATIONSHIP BY ADDING 3D SUN APP AND GA QUAKES APP TO YOUR IPOD.

*

RESEARCH SEISMO-ELECTROMAGNETICS AND SOLAR MAXIMUM.

---

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

SEISMO- ELECTROMAGNETICS

 

Over the past 5 months there has been an increase in solar activity thus an increase in seismic activity, such as the earthquakes in Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Haiti, Chile, Turkey, and China and the volcanic eruption in Iceland. NASA’s STEREO program has been monitoring solar activity and has observed a significant amount of solar phenomenon. All of these earthquakes occurred in locations closest to the edges of the tectonic plates. Solar activity has a direct relationship on seismic activity. Think of a solar wind as a stream of plasma or energy hitting the Earth’s magnetic field for a period of 2-3 days. Granted, there has been solar phenomenon throughout the existence of our solar system, and seismic activity as well. The point is the two go hand in hand and solar activity has a direct effect on the planet’s tectonic plate movement. It is basically the driving force for the tectonic plates. As a result Earth’s core temperature gradually increases. This increase in the Earth’s core temperature causes the core to expand, thus causing Earth’s crust to be pushed outward and tectonic plates to move all at once, moving easier due to the hotter surface underneath it. As a result you see fissures created, earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanoes erupting. A simple analogy would be to compare the planet to a space ship protected by a force field. When plasma blasts are fired at the shield, the field generator heats up. If too much plasma blast is fired at the ship, the generator over heats and the ship is vulnerable to exposure to plasma blasts. This same analogy could be applied to the planet, but the planet’s generator does not cease to function. It just overheats. As a result of the core overheating it causes earthquakes. A simple calorimetry equation could be applied to this to explain how energy causes temperatures to rise.

 

CALORIMETRY EQUATION:

Q= mc∆T where

Q= energy (kilojoules)

m = mass (g)

c= specific heat capacity (joules/ grams x Kelvin)

∆T= change in temperature (final Temperature- initial Temperature)

 

The specific heat capacity of a substance is defined as the energy/temperature required raising the temperature of a substance by one Kelvin. Thus you can use this equation to determine the amount of energy created to cause a specific mass to raise it’s internal temperature by knowing the mass of the substance (m) multiplied by the specific heat capacity © multiplied by the Final temperature of the substance – the initial= ∆T or change in temperature. You can translate this equation by saying energy is created due to a change in temperature, and a change in temperature creates energy. (Q=∆T or ∆T=Q). You can expand on this equation and apply it to the planet and create a new equation.

 

This equation has not been published but it is based on A New Theory of Magnetic Storms (WIKIPEDIA). This theory sought to explain the phenomenon of geomagnetic storms. It is now understood that the Sun continually emits plasma in the solar wind and that this phenomenon is amplified whenever solar flares occur. I based this equation on the theory of which Earth’s magnetic shield is created. Earth’s magnetic shield is created by a constant amount of energy (the core) spinning so fast that its energy has no where else to go but outside of the container of which it is contained in, in the form of electromagnetic energy. Earth’s velocity of rotation is held constant because in space once an object is set in motion it stays in motion. Earth’s core energy is maintained by a constant/ adequate amount of energy emitted from the sun in the form of plasma that maintains the high temperature of the Earth’s core.

 

EXPANDING FROM THE CALORIMETRY EQUATION TO APPLY IT TO THE PLANET’S PRODUCTION OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD:

In order for this equation to work I have to add some factors into the equation to account for how the Earth’s magnetic shield is made. I add factors of the speed at which the planet is rotating, stable temperature to produce an electromagnetic shield, and the amount of energy exerted from the sun in the form of plasma.

 

I call this equation EC equation after my initials and it stands for Earth Calorimetry

 

(-P)+[Q= MCS( T+P)] where

 

Q= energy of the magnetic field

P= the energy in the form of plasma expelled from the sun

M= mass of the planet

C= the specific heat capacity of the core

S= the speed of rotation (velocity)

T= the stable temperature of the core to produce the electromagnetic field

 

Where P has a direct relationship on maintaining a stable T (in temperature/ energy) spinning at S (velocity) to project energy outward in the form of an electromagnetic energy. However P (plasma energy) diminishes Q, but at the same time it adds to the internal temperature (T) to produce Q. This is called the exchange of energy from electromagnetic shield to the core, thus in order to maintain a stable T and a strong Q, P<Q (the energy exerted from plasma has to be weaker than the electromagnetic shield). Plasma energy from the sun is necessary in maintaining our magnetic shield, but in an adequate amount. If P increases, then T increases because T is positively affected by the energy from plasma and Q becomes weaker because it is negatively affected by plasma. Thus when P= a higher amount of energy that is needed from solar phenomenon such as solar flares and strong solar winds, the core heats up and expands due to an increase in temperature, and causes all tectonic plates to move and volcanoes to erupt. Collisions between two or more plates cause earthquakes and if it’s in the ocean tsunamis occur.

 

DETERMINING THE DISTANCE OF WHICH EACH TECTONIC PLATE MOVES:

 

To determine the distance of which each tectonic plate moves you can use the right side of the top equation.

 

MCS(T+P)= Energy required to make the electromagnetic field or EME

 

You use this value to make this equation:

 

EME/ the mass of one tectonic plate by an amount of distance multiplied by energy necessary to move it.

 

or

 

EME divided by (mass of one tectonic plate (m) divided by x amount of distance(d) multiplied by energy(e)

 

EME/ (m/d x e)= distance of which the plate travels

 

Each distance of which each plate travels will be different because each plate has a different mass.

 

DETERMINING THE MAGNITUDE OF THE EARTHQUAKE:

 

To determine magnitude you have to know which direction each plate is traveling and its velocity.

 

Velocity= distance/time

 

To determine velocity you have to determine the amount of energy exerted on the magnetic shield per the amount of time, thus you will know the distance per amount of time.

 

When you determine which way the plates moves you can find the magnitude of impact between two plates by knowing the mass of the heavier plate multiplied by its velocity by the mass of the lighter plate multiplied by its velocity.

 

(Greater Value =Mass of plate A (MA) x velocity) divided by (Lesser Value = Mass of plate B (MB) x velocity) = The magnitude of impact.

 

or

 

(MA x VA)= MAV

(MB x VB)= MBV

 

If MAV>MBV then

MAV/MBV= Magnitude of impact.

 

If MBV>MAV then

MBV/MAV= Magnitude of impact.

 

 

THE FORCE OF GRAVITY

 

Over the next two years the planet will be at risk of a higher amount of solar phenomenon (strong solar winds and solar flares), in terms of frequency of event, magnitude of event, and duration time of each event. This period is called a solar maximum. The solar maximum is believed to be caused by a smaller gravitational force affecting the mass of a larger object in space. This gravitational force is believed to be caused by the mass of a brown dwarf beyond the Oort cloud or the mass of the center of our solar system’s universe. This gravitational force is believed to cause the perturbing orbits of our gas giants. Thus when the gas giants continue along their orbit and come close to the gravitational pull of this mass, their orbits are pulled towards this mass. When the gas giants continue on their orbit past this gravitational pull, it adjusts itself to the gravitational force of our sun. This relationship is shown by this rule:

 

Regular Orbit Force of Gravity

Sun ← Gas Giants

 

Perturbed Orbit Force of Gravity

Sun ← Gas Giants → Center of the universe

 

This same gravitational force that perturbs the orbits of our gas giants affects our sun. The same way in which the moon affects our planet (the tides of the ocean), this lesser gravitational force of attraction affects the tides of our sun. When it is high tide, it produces an abundant amount of solar phenomenon. There are 3 scenarios during a solar maximum classified by the amount of energy expelled from the sun. These 3 levels of risk factors also depend on the frequency of phenomenon, magnitude of phenomenon, and duration time of each phenomenon.

 

LOW RISK FACTOR- The amount of energy supplied by each solar phenomenon is enough energy to raise the temperature of the core to cause earthquakes ranging from 6.0- 10.0, causing volcanic eruption, fissure formations, and tsunamis.

 

INTERMEDIATE RISK FACTOR- The amount of energy supplied by each solar phenomenon is enough energy to significantly raise the temperature of the core to cause earthquakes ranging from 6.0- 14.0, causing an abundant amount of volcanic eruptions, an abundant amount of fissure formations, and mega tsunamis. The aftermath of the volcanic eruptions will cast the entire planet into a nuclear winter due to the ash in the atmosphere. Global climates will plummet, destroying all agriculture and creating global famine. Humanity could see a significant reduction in population due to fatalities of such events as well as the aftermath.

 

HIGH RISK FACTOR- The amount of energy supplied by each solar phenomenon is so significant and perpetual that the core temperature continuously rises and “OVERHEATS” causing an abundant amount of high magnitude earthquakes, mega tsunamis, and super volcanic eruptions world wide. The amount of energy would be so significant that the magnetic shied is so damaged that it is not repairable. As a result of the core overheating, the iron/nickel alloy that makes up the core is omitted by an abundant amount of volcanic eruptions, thus covering the planet in iron/ nickel alloy. The aftermath of such event would be extinction of life on Earth. Thousands of years later the iron/ nickel alloy will oxidize and create rust and the electromagnetic shield will be weak. The planet will basically be dead. I believe this is what happened to Mars. Mars was once a planet like ours, but an abundant amount of energy killed the planet.

 

APPLYING THE STUDY OF SEISMO-ELECTROMAGNETICS TO CREATE NEW TECHNOLOGIES:

 

If the upcoming chain of events from the solar maximum is of low risk, the aftermath of such events will allow humanity to continue. This study and equation could be very valuable information in the development of new technologies. We could in a sense replicate this complex process of nature. We could create a smaller yet proportional in size model of the planet. This model’s core will consist of and iron/ nickel alloy, followed by layers of material that mimics the layers of our planet. In order to create the energy necessary to start the heat of the core we would have to have a nano-atomic bomb, to generate a significant amount of energy. We would also have to have enough energy to create the right amount of velocity necessary to produce the energy outside of its container. Once this is achieved we could harness the thermal energy of this process of creating this electric magnetic field to maintain its velocity. We would also have to apply an electromagnetic current to maintain the adequate temperature/ energy of the core to produce the electromagnetic shield. We could also harness the thermal energy of this process to produce electricity.

 

 

 

 

YOU CAN FOLLOW ALONG AND SEE THIS RELATIONSHIP BY ADDING 3D SUN APP AND GA QUAKES APP TO YOUR IPOD.

 

RESEARCH:

SEISMO-ELECTROMAGNETICS

GALACTIC ALIGNMENT

SOLAR MAXIMUM

 

[Ophiolite]

SEISMO- ELECTROMAGNETICS

*

Over the past 5 months there has been an increase in solar activity thus an increase in seismic activity, such as the earthquakes in Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Haiti, Chile, Turkey, and China and the volcanic eruption in Iceland.

Please provide evidence that there has been an increase in seismic activity. Earthquakes are commonplace, though only those causing major property damage or loss of life are likely to make the news. I asser that there has been no significant increase in seismic activity coincident with the increase in solar activity. It is up to you to demonstrate otherwise.

(I also note in passing that a volcanic eruption is hardly seismic activity.)

 

All of these earthquakes occurred in locations closest to the edges of the tectonic plates.

Excuse the pun, but that is hardly earth shattering news. The concentration of earthquakes in certain discrete areas of the planet was one of the major pieces of evidence that led to plate tectonic theory. In short, I am not clear why you mentioned this.

 

Solar activity has a direct relationship on seismic activity.

I think you will have a hard time demonstrating such a relationship.

Earth’s magnetic shield is created by a constant amount of energy (the core) spinning so fast that its energy has no where else to go but outside of the container of which it is contained in, in the form of electromagnetic energy.

This is incorrect. The Earth's magnetic field is created by convection currents in the molten outer core. Your suggestion that the energy goes outside the container 'because it has nowhere esle to go' is quaint, but is not physics.

 

Earth’s core energy is maintained by a constant/ adequate amount of energy emitted from the sun in the form of plasma that maintains the high temperature of the Earth’s core.

This is incorrect. The core's energy, by which you appear to mean its temperature, is well accounted for by a combination of residual heat from gravitational collapse during the accretion period of the planet, decay of radioactive elements and phase changes.

 

Since your premises are flawed I see no point in dissecting the rest of your thesis. I wish you luck in trying to convince others of its value, but I suggest you make a more extended effort to understand what you are investigating.

[Yomomma]

I hope the knowledge that we have right now proves me wrong. However it is very obvious that the increase of solar activity has caused an increase in seismic activity.

In the next 8 months I will record solar activity provided by NASA's STEREO program. The past 5 months the data I have seen from STEREO has shown an increase in solar activiy, but I have not recorded it. I only started recording it in April until now. I also have recorded Earthquake information provided from Australia. USGS does not provide a chart that you can send to Excell, so I obtained information from Australian Government Geoscience. Seismo- electromagnetics is entirely possible. I will make a more

"extended effort to understand what I am investigating" by taking Geology and Physics class next semester, and present it to my professors to get their opinion on the topic. Thank You for proving me wrong. Now I feel a lot better knowing the planet will not end up like Mars due to an intense amount of solar activity during the upcoming Solar Maximum caused by the galactic alignment.

 

By the way how did Mars end up the way it is today? They say it use to be like Earth. How did it end up tectonically inactive and no magnetic field? Supposedly it did 4 billion years ago.

 

Lets just say my equation about how to produce and electromagnetic shield is right.

 

(-P)+[Q= MCS( T+P)] where

 

Q= energy of the magnetic field

P= the energy in the form of plasma expelled from the sun

M= mass of the planet

C= the specific heat capacity of the core

S= the speed of rotation (velocity)

T= the stable temperature of the core to produce the electromagnetic field

 

If it is, could it help prove how too much energy ( in the form of plasma) can cause the core of the planet's temperatures to fluctuate, and "overheat" thus ommiting material of the core onto the surface. And could it also help explain how Mars ended up the way it is today?

Edited May 13, 2010 by Yomomma

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/data/centennial.php

 

You can get all that data and compare it to any data you might have on solar flare activity over that time period, which is presumably available.

 

Alternately, you can use this:

 

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/epic/epic_global.php

 

and get data for any time period you want, in whatever format you want.

 

Just remember that correlation does not mean causation.

[Yomomma]

Thank You. I will continue my research and I hopefully will prove that the "theory" of Seismo- electromagnetics is valid as well as the equation provided to support this theory.

 

I will end it on this note until I collect enough data to support this claim.

 

Seismo-electromagnetics is the study of electromagnetic phenomena associated with seismic activity such as earthquakes and volcanoes. Electromagnetic phenomena is caused by electromagnetic energy from the sun from solar activity.

 

Earth has plate tectonics as well as a magnetic field. The interaction between the magnetic field and solar phenomenon is geomagnetic storms. So if the "theory" of Seismo- electromagnetics is valid, it would also help explain why Mars has no magnetic field and is tectonically inactive.

 

MARS>>>> NO MAGNETIC FIELD (LOW)>>>> TECTONICALLY INACTIVE (LOW)

 

EARTH>>>> MAGNETIC FIELD>>>> TECTONICALLY ACTIVE

 

If anyone is interested in helping me prove that the equation and theory is valid, please message me. Otherwise claims that this theory and equation are false is unhelpful.

 

Thank You for at least replying and taking interest in this topic.

[pink_trike]

It's over my head, but I recall reading an article on Science Daily within the last 2 -3 months that reported similar conclusions.

Edited May 13, 2010 by pink_trike
Consecutive posts merged.

[Ophiolite]

If anyone is interested in helping me prove that the equation and theory is valid, please message me. Otherwise claims that this theory and equation are false is unhelpful.

I will respect your wish and post no more negative criticisms of your speculation. However, be aware that this is not how science is done. If you cannot handle the objections that I and others raise, demonstrating why we are mistaken by using evidence and logic, then you will never be able to convert your speculation into a viable theory. You should be the harshest critic of your own ideas. You should be able to see why the flaws in your speculation. If you choose not to and fail to address those flaws then you will not progress very far with this idea specifically, or in science in general.

 

Again, I wish you well, but urge you to consider an alternative approach.

[Yomomma]

HELP PROVING EQUATION:

 

In order to determine the value of Q or the output of energy (kj) of the magnetic shield I have to determine:

 

A) How much energy is ommited from the sun (P) on a daily basis (kj) during the standards solar energy emission ( sun being in a low solar cycle)

 

B) Use the study of Boltzmann Constant to convert the temperature of Earth's inner core to a different unit of measurement ( Kelvin to kilojoules). If we had choosen to measure temperature in units of energy then Boltzmann constant would not be needed at all.

 

C) The mass of the inner core.

 

With this information I am certain that the eqation will accurately depict the relationship between solar activity and how it affects the temperatures of Earth's inner core as well as determine Q. With this information I can change the equation to this:

 

(-P)+[Q= MS(T+P)] where

 

P= energy of the sun (kj)

Q= energy of the magnetic shield (kj)

M= mass of the inner core

S= velocity of the speed of rotation of the planet

T= initial energy of Earth's core

 

Once this is achieved I can determine how an abnormal amount of energy from the sun substantially raises the temperature of the core. To do this I would have to convert P into temperature on the right side of the equation and keep C. (energy required raising the temperature of a substance by one K) and I have to know:

 

A) specific heat capacity of Earth's core

B) the amount of energy from abnormal solar behavior

C) the conversion between kilojoules to temperature (kj to K)

 

with that being said the equation would remain

(-P) +[Q=MCS(T+P)]

 

If we continue to experience abnormal solar activity between now and the next two years as well as a contiually increase in earthquake magnitude and frequency, then return to this thread to help me figure it out.

---

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

Im guessing the scientific community as well as the inhabitants of the planet are not taking the seriousness of this problem that lies ahead. It has always been in our nature to be combatant and fight against one another. So what if I am wrong, the question to ask yourself is what if I am right? In the face of a common threat we need to work together to solve the values of this equation. If we do we can create a proportionate model of this process and prevent our species from extinction by propelling 10 individuals into space, thus preserving our existence. It will take the efforts of the entire planet.

 

I cant solve this on my own. I need the help of everyone.

 

You can collect solar activity data from this site:

 

http://www.lmsal.com/solarsoft/latest_events_archive.html

 

You can collect seismic data froom this site:

 

http://www.ga.gov.au/earthquakes/

 

We can create a derivative with this data to find the values.

Please take this threat seriously and reconsider your criticism and opinions. The continuity of our species depends on it.

Edited May 14, 2010 by Yomomma
Consecutive posts merged.

[Bignose]

(-P)+[Q= MS(T+P)] where

 

P= energy of the sun (kj)

Q= energy of the magnetic shield (kj)

M= mass of the inner core

S= velocity of the speed of rotation of the planet

T= initial energy of Earth's core

 

 

OK, two problems immediately jump out.

 

1) Why is the equals sign INSIDE the square brackets? This is meaningless in a mathematical sense. An equation has one group of symbols, which can include brackets, but every open bracket is closed before you get to the equals sign, set equal to another group of symbols, again with the brackets closed before the end of the term.

 

This same equation has been posted several times, so I don't think that it is just a typo. So, please explain it further.

 

2) If I ignore the brackets per my issue #1, it reads -P + Q = MS(T + P), right? But, if so, there is a units error, because if the left hand side is energy (per your descriptions of the terms) then the right side has to have units of energy as well. But, the terms inside the parentheses have units of energy, and MS isn't unitless (mass times a frequency). Hopefully, fixing my issue #1 will remedy this issue as well, but at the moment, this expression isn't even dimensionally consistent.

[Yomomma]

I made the equation read that way because the energy of the sun dimishes the magnetic shield, but at the same time add thermal energy to the Earth's core.

 

If you have the equation read Q= MS(T+P) that accounts for how thermal energy when held at a constant and necessary speed of rotation necessary to project the energy out from its core relative to its mass, then that energy projects from its core.

 

From what we know:

 

T= 5,700 K, the temperature of Earth's core. However I am trying to find a conversion of units. (K to KJ) Temperature itself is a form of thermal energy(kj). The Earth's core is iron/ nickel alloy held at 330 to 360 gigapascals. This amount of pressure causes the core to be solid. With that being said, the Earth's core must conduct electromagnetic energy, thus when their is extra solar activity, the temperature increases. (thermal energy)

 

S= 1,674.4 km/h, which is the speed of rotation. I need to multiply it by some constant so that the units cancel. Such as x amount of energy/ x amount of velocity, or kj / km/h. (kinetic energy)

 

M= Mass of inner core. I must also multiply this by some constant so the units cancel. Such as x amount of energy can sustain x amount of mass or kj / kg. (specific heat capacity)

 

When we understand how all of these factors contribute to how Earth's magnetic shield is created, it will also explain how the energy of the sun dimishes the magnetic shield and adds to the thermal heat of the core. Also understanding these factors, we could duplicate the process.

 

To duplicate this process we would first have to have a iron/nickel sphere followed by outer layers similar to the outer layers of the Earth, then compress it, and have it in its cooled state. Then if we spin it at 1,674.4 km/h and apply an electrical current while it is spinning, my hypothesis is that energy will be transferred through each layer to the iron/nickel core and raise the temperature / thermal energy from the inside out. Once we apply the necessary energy relative to its mass, my hypothesis is that a magnetic shield will be created.

 

In order to do this we have to understand how energy from the sun affects the thermal energy of the core. Once we find that relationship, as well as the constants, then we could duplicate this process, but in a smaller proportional size.

 

Edited May 18, 2010 by Yomomma

[Bignose]

How can you add T + P? Per your graphic, T has units of kJ (energy) and P has units of kJ/s (energy per time)!

 

This is like saying 4 bananas plus 2 scissors = a quantity of tables.

 

Everything you add together has to have the same unit, or at least the same kind.

 

i.e. 1 km + 5 km = 6 km. Or 1 km + 50 inches = 1.00127 km. The two things being added are both lengths.

 

If they don't have the same unit, they can't be added.

 

1 km + 5 gallon = something that is completely nonsensical.

 

Dimensional consistency is an absolute necessity for a meaningful equation. It isn't a guarantee of meaningfulness, because an equation can have correct units but still be nonsensical, but it is necessary.

 

Also, I still don't understand how there is an equal sign INSIDE a parentheses. Can you please write it in a more conventional notation? I cannot understand it at all unless you put it into a notion I can understand. If Q = MS(T+P), then what is -P + Q equal to? If it isn't equal to anything, then all you have is an expression, not an equation, and again, not terribly meaningful.

 

Also also, you cannot directly convert temperature into an energy. Because temperature is an intrinsic properly, and energy is extrinsic. That is, temperature is independent of the quantity of mass of an substance. You can have 1 mg of a substance at 500 K or 1000 kg, and the temperature is the same. However, energy does depend on the mass of the substance. If 1 mg of a substance has 5 kJ of energy in it, that is significantly different than 1000 kg or a substance with 5 kJ. You will need to know the mass of a substance at a certain temperature to estimate energy and vice versa.

Edited May 19, 2010 by Bignose

[1bobwhite]

Yomomma,

 

You have some interesting information to be considered.

 

Here are some sources that you may find helpful in your research. You may have to revise some of your views and your math after reading through it, but keep up your studies.

 

Check this one out first: http://www.springerlink.com/content/753717276h869880/

Solar activity and global seismicity of the earth

 

http://www.solarviews.com/eng/io.htm

Io

 

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980PEPI...21...22H

Gravitational heating of planets

 

http://www.planetaryexploration.net/jupiter/io/tidal_heating.html

Io: Jupiter's Volcanic Moon

Tidal Heating

 

http://lunarorigin.com/tidal-heating

TIDAL HEATING

 

http://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/geol100/lectures/02.html

Early history of the Earth

 

http://www.planetary.brown.edu/m42/m42_67.pdf

THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY OF THE EARTH ON THE BASIS OF THE

DRM-APPROACH. S. G. Valeev, S. V. Kurkina Ulyanovsk State Technical University, 32, Severny Venez

st., 432027, Russià sgv@ulstu.ru

 

It seems were are now in the beginning of another solar cycle with increasing magnetic sunspot activity and increasing radiance.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle

Impacts of the solar cycle

 

There does seem to be correlation between magnetic sunspot cycles, and seismic activity on the earth, according to these references.

 

Its apparently been happening like this for eons, so there is probably no need to be concerned about a doomsday scenario. Local human disasters caused by geologic event, though terrible, are nevertheless not indicative of worldwide disaster.

 

I hope you’ll find these helpful.

 

Bob.

[Yomomma]

OK. I will keep specific heat capacity in the J/ kg x K unit @ constant pressure. Does anyone know the relationship between the pressure of the Earth’s core and the specific heat capacity?

 

Also I said that the right side of the equation produces Q, but at the same time as the energy from the solar flares cause the thermal energy to go up, it diminishes the magnetic field. So this should be considered an expression then right?

 

If many of you remain skeptical on the relationship between solar flares and seismic activity please visit these links:

 

http://www.lmsal.com/solarsoft/latest_events_archive.html

An archive of all of the solar activity

 

http://www.ga.gov.au/earthquakes/

An archive of all of the seismic activity. You can export this data to Excel and use the data to work on.

 

http://www.iwse.ee.uec.ac.jp/cfp.pdf

A link to the International Workshop on Seismo- Electromagnetics in Tokyo, Japan.

 

I am trying to use the data from the above sources and utilize my equations or expressions above by doing a study on the Earthquakes in Chile.

 

http://www.hawaii.edu/malamalama/2010/04/earthquake-moves-continent/

A link to an article on the earthquakes in Chile. The Earthquakes in February in Chile moved the continent 10 feet. During that month you could also see a lot of A and B class solar flares.

 

Also remember that energy is neither created nor destroyed but it is simply converted from one form to another. With that in mind, what happens when the energy of a solar flare hits the magnetic shield? Does it just bounce off? Or does the Earth’s core temperatures increase?

 

If many of you remain skeptical on the outcome of the next Galactic alignment, I urge you to reconsider and read below:

 

Periods of Extinction: Comets, Global Warming, and Ice Ages

One notable theory, developed by paleontologist David Raup and colleague John Sepkoski, suggests that the planet undergoes a period of mass extinctions. Studies of the fossil record by David Raup and Jack Sepkoski shows that this was not an isolated event, but one of several mass extinctions that appear to occur on a regular 26 to 34 million year cycle. However the question was how could this be a reoccurring cycle rather than an act of randomness. On January 26, 1983 NASA launched an infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS), which found something very large at the edge of our solar system. On September 10, 1984 IRAS detected energy signature from an object beyond the Oort cloud. In 1992 NASA announced that the unexplained deviations in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune point to a large outer solar system body of incredible mass, our solar system orbits this mass on a highly tilted orbit, beyond 7 billion miles from the sun. Effects from the galactic core include a large amount of natural disasters, caused by the gravitational struggle between the galactic core and our star. As the solar system orbits the galactic core it has had galactic alignment before. The gravitational pull of the galactic core disturbs our planet’s sun by slightly pulling its position towards itself. This is believed to be the period of “global warming.” When the planet’s sun is being slightly pulled by the gravitational force of attraction of a larger object, it causes it to omit greater quantities of plasma. The slightest change in position causes a multitude of natural disaster by affecting the Earth’s climate and tidal system. The aftermath of greater quantities of plasma include abnormal weather patterns, seismic activity, and volcanic activity. If too much energy was released then it would cause pole reversals, and the aftermath of volcanic eruptions would cause the period of the “ice age.” An ice age is a natural system. There must have been a period of global warming prior to global cooling. Global warming is believed to be a natural process caused by an increase in solar plasma emission. As the solar system would come into alignment with the galactic core, global temperatures would increase. As Earth came to the winter solstice, the point in time where solar flares were most critical, Earth would experience a rise in seismic activity. More colloquially, “the ice age” refers to the most recent colder period that peaked at the last Glacial Maximum approximately 20,000 years ago, in which extensive ice sheets lay over large parts of the North American and Eurasian continents. As you can see by the graph, variation in temperatures fluctuates in relationship to carbon dioxide gas emissions caused by volcanoes. This also represents the period of time in which our sun comes into alignment with the galactic core.

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_ages

 

Natural Disasters

As 2012 approaches there will be a rise in solar plasma emission. NASA has found direct correlations between a rise in solar activity and abnormal weather patterns on Earth, shifts in the sun’s magnetic field, and seismic activity. Chinese and Japanese scientists claim solar activity affects the Earth’s climate far more than greenhouse gases, thus explaining a natural cause of heating and cooling trends. Due to the gravitational struggle between our sun and the galactic core, the Earth is experiencing natural disasters more frequently and more severe. Researchers say a storm is coming, one of the most intense solar storms ever recorded. According to Mausumi Dikpati of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, the next sunspot cycle will be 30 to 50 percent stronger than the previous one. The effects of this solar storm could be catastrophic. As 2012 approaches, the rise in solar activity will correspond with a rise in solar plasma emission, which could damage Earth’s magnetic field, and raise the internal temperature of the Earth’s core. The first sign that the planet is experiencing an increase in severity of solar storms would be to witness the aurora borealis further south. Next the planet would experience frequent earthquakes in response to solar flares. Finally the planet would experience strong electromagnetic storms, which would have detrimental effects on cell phones, GPS systems, weather satellites, and many other modern technologies. Solar flares are likely to increase in severity. In fact in 2005 Earth experienced an alarming increase in solar activity, evidenced by large sunspots and powerful solar flares. Dikpati’s forecast puts solar maximum at 2012. Natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina, 2003 and 2006 European heat wave, 2003 India heat wave, 2008 Myanmar cyclones, 2008 Afghanistan blizzard, and 2008 Chinese winter storms are all a part of the alarming increase in natural disasters world wide. Over the past twenty years we have seen an increase in severity of hurricanes, flooding, storms, blizzards, and drought. Due to drought, the environment is more susceptible to fires. Global warming is the cause of the increase in abnormal weather patterns, melting of the glaciers, and rise in sea level. Since 1998 every summer has been hotter than the year before it. However it is debatable on what causes global warming. Global warming is thought to be caused by humans, but it may be a natural process as well. Humans have accelerated global warming by pollution and carbon dioxide emission. 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake caused a mega tsunami killing 286,000 people in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India, and Thailand. 2005 Kashmir earthquake in Pakistan killed 86,000 people. Infrastructure across the globe is in decline because it is being pulled apart due to small and large seismic activity. Frictional heating from earthquakes will further ignite the Earth’s core, thus possibly erupting dormant volcanoes worldwide.

 

Galactic Alignment

The galactic alignment between the sun, the Earth, the galactic core, and nothing else in between is predicted to occur on December 21st 2012. When the galactic alignment occurs it will appear as if the sun were rising within the center of the Milky Way galaxy. This rare occurrence occurs every 26,000 years, and it will amplify the sun’s gravitational pull on Earth. Coincidentally ice ages occur around that amount of time as well. I hypothesize that previous galactic alignments Earth was not in that exact location in space that it would be struck by a strong enough solar flare to kill the planet. Everything seems to orbit something else. The Moon orbits the Earth. The Earth orbits the Sun. The Solar System orbits the center of the Milky Way. The Milky Way is a vast collection of 200 billion stars, measuring 100,000 light-years across. Like many galaxies, the Milky Way is a grand spiral, with all the stars slowly spinning around the super massive black hole at its center. It takes 220 million years for the Solar System to orbit the center of the Milky Way and return back to its original position. In other words, the Solar System orbit is 220 million years. Just think in the amount of time it takes for the Solar System to orbit around the Milky Way just once, life on Earth has completed changed. One galactic year ago, dinosaurs ruled the Earth. And the Solar System is only about 21 galactic years old. In fact, the Milky Way has probably only turned 62 times since the beginning of the Universe, 13.7 billion years ago. Galactic alignment also signifies a polar shift. A polar shift is when the North Pole becomes the South Pole. This polar shift is possible because the galactic alignment produces solar storms, which causes the pole reversals. Our earth is a huge magnet, with its own north and south poles. A short-circuit with another external “beam of lightning,” or magnet, can end in a catastrophic polar reversal. At the very end of the polar reversal, the planet will enter another ice age. This estimated 26,000 year cycle will then start all over again. Strong solar maximums help explain many of these natural disasters as well as the heating and cooling trends. Galactic alignments have happened throughout the existence of the solar system. Previous alignments, the gravitational force of attraction of the galactic core was diminished due to the gas giants being caught by this force. Thus when this force caught the gas giants, the gravitational force of attraction was not as strong. It was strong enough to cause abnormal solar activity, thus causing earthquakes and periods of heating and cooling trends, and polar shifts. However this galactic alignment is significant because there is no other mass diminishing the full force of attraction. The other reason why previous galactic alignments did not kill the planet was that the Earth was not directly in between the sun and the galactic core alone. In 2012 there is going to be no other mass in between the sun, the earth, and the galactic core. As a result the full force of attraction from the center of the galaxy causes the sun to have the strongest solar maximum known to this planet. Granted, we have had solar maximums before, however none of them have been between the Sun, the Earth, and the center of the Galaxy alone. During these other solar maximums, there was always a larger mass in the way diminishing the force of attraction, thus it was not as strong as well as the Earth was not in that exact location where it would kill the planet.

 

 

This model represents the solar system orbiting the galactic core. The Orange is Mars, The Green is Earth, The Brown is the Gas Giants, the light green is Earth's position in space at any given time during previous galactic alignments, and the light brown is the Gas Giant's position in space at any given time during previous galactic alignments.

 

If many of you wish to remain skeptical questions to ask astronomers are:

 

Based on velocities of a planet's revolution,

 

Where is Earth relative to the sun and the galactic core?

 

Where are the Gas Giants relative to the sun and the galactic core?

Where will the Earth be on December 21st, 2012 relative to the sun and the galactic core?

 

Where will the Gas Giants be on December 21st, 2012 relative to the sun and the galactic core?

 

And based on the velocity of one revolution for Mars, at what point of time was Mars in between the Sun and the Galactic core alone?

[Bignose]

OK. I will keep specific heat capacity in the J/ kg x K unit @ constant pressure. Does anyone know the relationship between the pressure of the Earth’s core and the specific heat capacity?

 

That doesn't address any of my questions about adding terms with unlike units (T & P), or having an equals sign inside of parentheses and thus not having a meaningful equation/expression. How soon can these be addressed?

[Yomomma]

I am clearly limited by the amount of knowledge I have. If you would like to add or edit parts of the expression so that it makes sense to others and it can be actually used then do so. This is why I posted this, so that others that have a more extensive knowledge in fields such as physics, mathematics, geology, engineering, and astronomy can edit what I have been trying to explain to others and make more sense out of it. This was the point. To start a discussion and to involve others so that a more thorough investigation amongst the public is started.

 

Obviously if the government and government entities such as NASA and USGS knows that we are at high risk of natural disaster due to the galactic alignment, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO TELL US.

 

The purpose of this is for the public to work together to analyze what is going on around them. That way we could help eachother to see how much of threat the outcome of this next galactic alignment really is and we could share and discuss solutions to at least save a few if it is indeed a threat to he whole planet. The main purpose is to learn, discuss, build and distribute knowledge upon knowledge. Not to point out fallacies and try and discredit eachother but to HELP EACHOTHER. Which we have failed to do so for thousands of years, thus we have not been able to master this technology yet. So if you like to edit the above equation or expression please do so, it would only help.

 

 

 

IF BY THE NEXT WINTER SOLSTICE, CONTACT BETWEEN SOLAR FLARES/CME OR STRONG SOLAR WINDS OCCUR AGAIN, EARTHQUAKE FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE INCREASE, AND MORE VOLCANOES START ERUPTING, THEN WE NEED TO REALLY CONSIDER THIS.

 

With that being said, here are a few YOUTUBE videos of experiments that uses magnetic energy to levitate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am thinking if you create magnetic energy by the process of which the Earth makes it ( thermal energy and kinetic energy) in a weightless environment or in space then maybe that energy that causes those objects to levitate in one direction will be pushed out and it falls back around it like as shown:

 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Earths_Magnetic_Field_Confusion.svg

Edited May 24, 2010 by Yomomma