Jump to content

Are both fundamental forms fundamental?


Recommended Posts

I've been studying some geometry and I've got a basic question:

 

The Riemann Curvature Tensor can be written using either the first fundamental form ([math]g_{\alpha\beta}[/math]) or the second fundamental form ([math]b_{\alpha\beta}[/math]), as indicated by the Codazzi-Peterson and Gauss equations. So I was wondering, is there a difference in the geometric information stored in both forms, or are they completely different, i.e. given one of these descriptions of a geometry (say [math]b_{\alpha\beta}[/math]), is it possible to find the other (say [math]g_{\alpha\beta}[/math])?

 

If not, what is the added value of each of the fundamental forms over the other?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.