Adam Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 a well respected tv channel, admired by many people who are interested in science and nature. HOw else do you want to prove OOBE, is there any other way? idont think so.
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Yeah, the studies, if accurate, would be published in scholarly journals such as Nature or Science, and before they were published they would be peer reviewed.
Adam Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 NO, something like this will never be officially accepted, even if there's most legitimate experiment to prove it. Because of religious and Pollitical control, If people suddenly realize of out of body it will make them think of "souls" "afterlife" as far as i checked, That would be disadvantagous to government.
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Well since Nature is a British journal, I doubt the US government could do anything about it. Our government is dead set against cloning, doesn't stop information about that from getting out.
Adam Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Government could stop anything they wanted to, and cloning is harmless it hasn't really changed general public opinion. But same way you needed to close that threat, government closes and censures Issues. If they see someone has a good point and can use it against em, they eliminate it. PERIOD end of story
JaKiri Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by Adam NO, something like this will never be officially accepted, even if there's most legitimate experiment to prove it. Because of religious and Pollitical control, If people suddenly realize of out of body it will make them think of "souls" "afterlife" as far as i checked, That would be disadvantagous to government. To, say, the extremely religious Christian US Government? People who block stem cell research because of souls? etc?
JaKiri Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone You couldn't possibly be more ignorant. Thanks
Adam Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Conspiracy ? how does it work it could easily slip away, right by you, without you noticing for example SEPT 11, red cross collected 400 mil for victims and families, and said they will give it to them, What happend? they shared the money, paid off not to say anything and got away with using the collected money for own purposes. And no one except me wants to know what happend to the money, - Conspiracy - , notice how at the end they said they're gonna put the money on interest and wait... That's all there is so it, end of story
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri Thanks The comment was to adam, in case you thought it was towards you :/
JaKiri Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone The comment was to adam, in case you thought it was towards you :/ It was misunderstanding with mild humourous intent
Adam Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Yea but it's an example, try to use that scenario and think of the election in 2000 there was a problem with FLORIDA Bushes brother was a governor at that time. Think about it.
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 It was all over the news 24/7 for weeks. Some coverup that was. The supreme court was right in halting it, enough is enough. there would still be recounting if the court hadn't stopped it.
JaKiri Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by Adam Yea but it's an example, try to use that scenario and think of the election in 2000 there was a problem with FLORIDA Bushes brother was a governor at that time. Think about it. And they used documented illegal methods to stop Democrats from voting, etc. Yes, we know.
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Yeah, it's called making the ballot too hard for democrats to read, because straight lines hhuhhhh
JaKiri Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone It was all over the news 24/7 for weeks. Some coverup that was. The supreme court was right in halting it, enough is enough. there would still be recounting if the court hadn't stopped it. Hey! Ever notice that the Supreme Court Judges who voted to alter the recount date to a time when it couldn't possibly have finished on were Republicans! Ever notice that Gore was catching up very quickly?
JaKiri Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone Yeah, it's called making the ballot too hard for democrats to read, because straight lines hhuhhhh Such as banning people without convictions from voting because they have 'a similar name' to convicted felons?
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Who demanded the recounts? Gore. Sounds like a Democratic conspiracy to get him more votes.
kenel Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 The UIC Police released a sketch of two possible attackers/rapists, one who attacked a woman, stole her purse, and ran off...the other raped the woman before running off. Point of the story: One of the sketches looked astonishingly similar to Adam.
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri Such as banning people without convictions from voting because they have 'a similar name' to convicted felons? Documentation?
Adam Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 My point is not the election specifically. My point is that the conspiracy exists, and the more we choose not to participate in researching it, the more controlled we become and manipulated by those in power. Therefore a lot of Information will always be denied to us.
fafalone Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Actually I spend quite a bit of time researching REAL conspiracies. Not this psychic crap you're rambling on about.
JaKiri Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone Documentation? Read 'Stupid White Men'. It'll all be in there.
Adam Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Originally posted by Adam ever been to a psychic ? probally not, because people tell you it's a hoax, but you should trying one out, even if it costs money, I gurantee to you she'll tell you things about you that only you know, your deepest secrets, HOW ? Reading your mind. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Actually my mum visits a psychic called Maria, who she's been seeing for about 8 years. Maria is extremely accurate to a degree that suggests "something is going on here". It's not that I don't believe that somehting is happening, it's just that I (we) require actual evidence derived scientifically. __________________ what about that ????????,
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now