glyphomouni Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Here is another problem that made me land on my head: if [math]sec\frac{A}{2}sec\frac{B}{2}sec\frac{C}{2}+sec\frac{A}{2}+sec\frac{B}{2}+sec\frac{C}{2} -2=0[/math] ,then one of the angles (A,B,C) of the triangle ABC is 90 degrees. How do we start??
the tree Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Well, the equation is symmetric about A, B and C for a start, so it doesn't matter which one you decide to be equal to 90. After that you'll need to look at various trig identities that you know.
Physicsfan Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 (edited) what exactly are you supposed to find? Edited June 3, 2010 by Physicsfan
glyphomouni Posted June 3, 2010 Author Posted June 3, 2010 Well, the equation is symmetric about A, B and C for a start, so it doesn't matter which one you decide to be equal to 90. After that you'll need to look at various trig identities that you know. Thanks i will try in that direction
the tree Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Oh I'm really sorry, I completely misread the OP. You shouldn't substitute in 90 since it's what you're trying to prove.
Physicsfan Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Oh I'm really sorry, I completely misread the OP. You shouldn't substitute in 90 since it's what you're trying to prove. now i understood the question too. thanks:-) now ABC is a triangle so A+B+C=180 and [imath]\frac{A+B+C}{2}=90[/imath].
shyvera Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Here is another problem that made me land on my head: if [math]sec\frac{A}{2}sec\frac{B}{2}sec\frac{C}{2}+sec\frac{A}{2}+sec\frac{B}{2}+sec\frac{C}{2} -2=0[/math] ,then one of the angles (A,B,C) of the triangle ABC is 90 degrees. How do we start?? Have you noticed that for any x such that [math]0<x<\pi[/math] you always have [math]\sec\tfrac x2>1\,?[/math] Thus, for any angles [math]A,\,B,\,C[/math] in a triangle, we always have [math]\sec\tfrac A2\sec\tfrac B2\sec\tfrac C2+\sec\tfrac A2+\sec\tfrac B2+\sec\tfrac C2-2>2[/math] and so the left-hand side of your equation can never be equal to 0. The assertion is therefore vacuously true*. *The implication [math]p\Rightarrow q[/math] is said to be vacuously true iff the statement [math]p[/math] is false.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now