fottry55i6 Posted June 10, 2010 Posted June 10, 2010 If you are spinning a circle made of paper, we know that the area near the edge is moving faster than the area near the centre. Does that mean that with a large enough circle, you could make the edge go faster than light??
swansont Posted June 10, 2010 Posted June 10, 2010 No. A real material would fall apart, and for a fictional material that didn't, there would be length contraction of any moving segment, giving you a curved geometry such that the circumference would ever exceed c. IIRC this thought experiment led Einstein into the curved geometry of General Relativity.
darkenlighten Posted June 13, 2010 Posted June 13, 2010 Not to mention the energy required to get something like that up to speed. Since the amount of torque needed is related to the angular momentum, which is related to its moment of inertia, which involves mass/radius.
New Zealand Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 (edited) Going by what they have said i'm probably wrong, but I would have thought that a 'hyperthetical' material that didn't fall apart should, in a vacuum, be able to get to ANY speed, as there would be no friction;Therefore it would keep any kinetic energy that it aquired, and would not lose its speed. If you could keep supplying more and more energy, it should just keep getting faster. Edited June 16, 2010 by New Zealand Grammar
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now