insane_alien Posted June 26, 2010 Posted June 26, 2010 you're going to have to post more than that, what application?
mississippichem Posted June 26, 2010 Posted June 26, 2010 In a general sense I would say yes H2O2 is more environmentally friendly, but it really depends on what reaction is being carried out. This will affect the nature of the reduced oxidant and whether or not it is a polluting by-product.
UC Posted June 27, 2010 Posted June 27, 2010 H2O2 is a relatively poor antibacterial at low concentrations, IIRC. H2O2 injection combined with ozonolysis is much more effective IIRC as it generates free hydroxyl radicals. This however is probably quite a bit pricier than the old standby chlorine (or chloramine treatment)
Horza2002 Posted June 27, 2010 Posted June 27, 2010 Again itl depend on what you intend to use it for. While under some conditions H2O2 decomposes to water and oxygen it does not always. And like UC says, a chlorine treatment is probably cheaper
insane_alien Posted June 27, 2010 Posted June 27, 2010 and there are many situations where it cannot be substituted for chlorine
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now