MidasProject Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 (edited) Hello to all! My goal in making this post is to reveal a new form of technology that will literally change the face of the world: Magnetizing noble metals. I urge you all to view this video demonstrating the technological advancement our team has found through 40 years of intensive research. This is no joke! This affects all markets ranging from gold, silver, platinum, aluminum and even diamonds (carbon). http://www.jerrypippin.com/Midas.wmv Please view this video with open eyes and open ears. If any of you need to get in contact with me, my email is themidasproject@gmail.com We have this technology at our disposal, and are willing to demonstrate it personally. Again, we are VERY serious! Cheers, Jared Robbins Edited July 1, 2010 by MidasProject I forgot to state something.
insane_alien Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 okay, finally managed to download the video here's my notes on it 1/SOME science fiction has come to pass, by no means all of it, the large majority being utter junk. all of the ones that came true have been technological barriers rather than physical barriers. 2/ frequency barrier? wtf? 3/ i'm sensing.... numerology 4/ total misunderstanding of the word moment in 'magnetic moment' 5/ no really, you couldn't be more wrong about moment, its not a measure of time in this case. 6/ bits of metal sliding of a sloped device? really? 7/ arbitrary wave form generator? what is this? startrek? </sarc> seeing as it needs 750W i'm going to assume an electromagnet is part of this. 8/ bingo 9/ sudoku puzzles? 10/ oh i get whats happening, you're using your 'arbitrary waveform generator' connected to the electromagnet to induce currents in the metals so they tend to stick to the face. 11/ good thing you keep poking the coin with a stick, you don't want it melting and ruining your video. veiwers should note the distinct lack of contact between the coin and the hand. 12/ no product loss? yeah, right in your dreams. also, micron sized gold particles are already seperated easily. this thing will have trouble deentraining them from the rock they are in. 13/ ooo oscilloscope. hi-tech stuff here. seriously, there's a large amount of frequencies you can use for this, it'll depend more on the geometry and electrical properties than on the element. 14/ copper and aluminium are not found in their metalic state in nature. most importantly, they aren't found in a conductive state. 15/jesus, you keep mentioning increased profits, where is the analysis of this? just saying it isn't going to make anyone with any business (never mind scientific) knowledge believe you. 16/ okay, the salt one is throwing me a bit here, but it's not enough to dismiss the null hypothesis that this is crap. it could be a vibrating sheet you've got there which would do the job. it'd do dick all for reverse osmosis though. from the wording i doubt you know what that is. 17/ lost audio, i'll post again when i get it working. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged18/ okay, to get audio i'm having to restart the video, how does salt show complex compounds can be affected? salt is incredibly simple. 19/ diamond is not crude oil, not sure how you can make a comparison there. and its not a surface tension thing, you don't 'break' surface tension. 20/ wow those are some old computers, sure you didn't mean 19th century instead of 21st there? 21/ why is there what appears to be a particle accelerator here? whats this got to do with anything said previously? 22/ you never proved they were magnetised, you just showed you could make them stick to a metal plate. 23/ those mentions aren't lending weight to the arguement. well, after killing some braincells watching that i am left at the conclusion that you've made a crap vibratory feeder. if you had actually magnetised it then you would have picked it up with a magnet after being 'treated' or even during the process by putting a permanent magnet to the side of it. it wasn't very convincing, especially due to the poor understanding of magnetism.
MidasProject Posted July 6, 2010 Author Posted July 6, 2010 We have the FREQUENCY's TO MAGNETIZE ; GOLD/SILVER,PLATINUM,DIAMONDS,ALUMINUM,COPPER,CARBON, ETC. " That was left behind during Mining operations" "With a 15% - 30% increase in profit(s)" This information is worth it's weight in Gold to the right corporation of these mined elements noted above and more. If you understand the process of Mining gold or any of the elements stated here then you know that they leave a lot of material behind , for gold it's called tailing's this will help them to get more product then they would have ever before ,even all the tailing's ,thus increasing their overall bottom line by 15 - 30 %. It is like when the particle's are to small for the machines to pick up they can scoop up parts of the ground and then put it through the system to get every grain of gold or whatever elements that is there out of the dirt and whatever else is there as well. It is a scientific fact that every element has a magnetic moment! These moments are so brief in time that they are almost non-existent. The demonstration on the link I posted above actually lengthens the duration of the element's magnetic moment by subjecting the element to an electromagnetic field of influence that is presently composed of magnetic lines of force that are both shaped and pulsed sat the determined frequency of the target element most intense spectral "line"(line consisting of the most energy in relationship to the other spectral lines that are produced by the same element. This use of technology explores the basic principals of the discussed magnetic properties of the elements. This information is used with the following equipment. An Arbitrary Waveform Generator ( The frequency is imputed into it) an amplifier for musical instruments and a specially designed magnet----non-ferrous elements such as gold, silver, copper, aluminum, carbon,(diamonds) platinum etc: are JUST AS MAGNETIC AS THE ELEMENT IRON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The National Bureau of Standards in Washington D.C. has the wave lengths of all the elements. Presently the frequency of a particular wave length is determined by dividing an electrical or electromagnetic wave length into the speed of light (Standard 186,000 miles per second or 300,000 meters per second). However, the present mathematical world system is not in harmony with the frequency expressed by NATURE itself. We have a precise mathematical system that is PROVEN by the applications you would see in the video demonstration. The National Bureau of Standards: 1.Is representative of the accurate measurement of standard wave lengths of the elements 2 Detailed description of photographed SPECTRA 3.Quantum interpretation of the SPECTRA LINES 4.How the SPECTRAL LINES are applied by the use of spectroscopy Spectra are usually measured at atmospheric pressure but must be corrected for the refractive index of air if employed for atomic interpretation. The table of wave numbers for converting wave lengths for 2000 to 10,000 Angstroms to wave numbers per centimeter in a vacuo with an accuracy of one part in one hundred million. Most atomic and ionic Spectra embrace thousands of different wavelengths that for correlation and standardization purposes must be measured with a precision of one part in one to twenty million. The published book-Table of Spectral-Line Intensities contains relative energies of 39,000 spectral lines in the range of 900 to 9000A (angstroms) characteristic of 70 metallic elements observed under standard conditions. This knowledge alone does not suffice unless ACCURATE mathematical system is inculcated. The general mathematical system of the world does not entail the accurate precision needed to accomplish WHAT HAS ALREADY ACCOMPLISHED AND PROVEN!!!!!!!!! All nature is obviously in tune with itself. The world at large does not have an inkling that certain frequencies can be produced by a Hewlett Packard Arbitrary Wave Form Generator. One can input the frequency of one's choice and produce the energy needed to achieve one's goal . Trees, plants and vegetation have been PROFOUNDLY INFLUENCED IN THIS UNIQUE MANNER OF DISCOVERY!!!! Trees HAVE been influenced to grow 5 times faster than normal DURING THE WINTER MONTHS.. Vegetable and plants grow 5 times faster with HIGHER QUALITY than regular growth. We have made plants grow in Arizona and Nevada in a desert environment. The aforementioned vital information presented is not theory or pure speculation and has already been proven. The applications of this technology are immense and will certainly be beneficial to all mankind. We can magnetize gold ,platinum, silver, titanium, copper, aluminum, and diamonds -by the carbon frequency that will also remove oil from shale rock. The aluminum frequency will warp radar so that planes or submarines will not be detected. By imputing into the magnetic an extractor will target any element that is even micron in size. If you have not seen it, the video will enhance your understanding. Talk is cheap. THIS IS PROVEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To Give you the short version here of the magnitude that this will have for mining is that it can greatly reduce waste of product by 15% - 30% over all the waste that they are incurring now without this REVOLUTIONARY invention. We have a video that we can send to you that goes into details and it shows the process of the magnetizing of the different elements.
swansont Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 Validity of claims generally varies in inverse proportion to the number of exclamation points.
MidasProject Posted July 6, 2010 Author Posted July 6, 2010 Seriously, is that the best response you can come up with? We have no problem doing live demonstrations where anyone can inspect the equipment used till their hearts content. Please come up with a better argument next time.
swansont Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 The video doesn't play for me; all I get is audio. But from the brief snippet I listened to, it sounded like the materials are only magnetic when the "device" is on. BFD. That's nothing new; it's called Faraday's law. I agree with insane_alien — you need to learn what "magnetic moment" actually means.
insane_alien Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 so, just going to ignore all the points i raised? pretty much what i expected to be honest.
MidasProject Posted July 6, 2010 Author Posted July 6, 2010 (edited) so, just going to ignore all the points i raised? pretty much what i expected to be honest. Well, the mere fact that you said: "how does salt show complex compounds can be affected? salt is incredibly simple." shows that you must not be a good listener... the video never stated that salt was a complex compound, it said it's showing the demonstration of salt to show that simple or complex compounds can be affected (insinuating that salt is simple). And the fact that you made a comment on the lack of hand use in the video demonstration means absolutely nothing and I have to question your ability to rationalize effectively! We're using the stick to show that the materials aren't being tampered with. We could easily make a video where we use our hands to move the materials, but what would that prove? I would have felt inclined to respond to you sooner if your arguments held any weight whatsoever, but they don't. The things you decided to nitpick can't be taken seriously, they only made me laugh at how ignorant/pompous the scientific community really is. It seems like you're just causing a dispute for the sake of arguing, which is very childish. Anything can be disputed. To begin a dispute, all one needs to do is open one's mouth and utter a few words. The mere existence of a dispute, therefore, does not in itself deny the reality of a thing. The dispute simply means that someone has chosen to quarrel, whether for good reasons or bad. And this would be directed at swansont: Faraday's Law relates the voltage produced in a coil in a magnetic field to the number of loops in the coil, the change in magnetic flux, and the time to carry out the change. This has nothing to do with that. The rest of the world doesn't know that noble metals CAN be magnetized using certain frequencies. If it's no big deal, then surely you can figure out these frequencies on your own and do your own tests. We do live demonstrations where anyone can inspect the equipment used to their hearts desire. We aren't hiding anything. When the frequency is outputted, the materials DO stick to a magnet. Every element has one or more isotopes that have unstable nuclei that are subject to radioactive decay, causing the nucleus to emit particles or electromagnetic radiation... these frequencies suspend and amplify the "magnetic moment" of the element(s) indefinitely. And fyi, a magnetic moment is the magnetic field produced by an atom. Edited July 6, 2010 by MidasProject
insane_alien Posted July 7, 2010 Posted July 7, 2010 Well, the mere fact that you said: "how does salt show complex compounds can be affected? salt is incredibly simple." shows that you must not be a good listener... the video never stated that salt was a complex compound, it said it's showing the demonstration of salt to show that simple or complex compounds can be affected (insinuating that salt is simple). you misinterpret my point. you cannot extrapolate that complex compounds will behave the same as simple compounds. this is what i was saying. you cannot use an extremely simple compound to prove that a complex compound would work. And the fact that you made a comment on the lack of hand use in the video demonstration means absolutely nothing and I have to question your ability to rationalize effectively! We're using the stick to show that the materials aren't being tampered with. We could easily make a video where we use our hands to move the materials, but what would that prove? well, my train of thought at that point in the video(i typed it as i watched) was that you were using magnetic induction to attract the metal(this works for all conductors) it has the downside of causing the metal to get quite hot after a while which would necessitate using something to carry it and not keeping it sitting still for long in case it melted on to the device. I would have felt inclined to respond to you sooner if your arguments held any weight whatsoever, but they don't. The things you decided to nitpick can't be taken seriously, they only made me laugh at how ignorant/pompous the scientific community really is. It seems like you're just causing a dispute for the sake of arguing, which is very childish. should probably be noted that i do not represent the scientific community in total, just myself. and nobody has ever accused me of pompousness before, i thik most who know me would consider that somewhat absurd. anyway, there are plenty of valid points in my post. including not 1 but 2 methods by which these results can be replicated without resorting to misinterpriting magnetic moment. And fyi, a magnetic moment is the magnetic field produced by an atom. no, its not. you didn't even bother to google that. the magnetic moment is a materials tendancy to align with a magnetic field. it's also measured in J/T not in seconds or any other unit of time. again you're just showing your ignorance of magnetism which takes further weight away from your arguements. so, can you post something of substance or what?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now