Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For complex living organisms and DNA virus, genetic information comes from DNA. For RNA virus genetic information comes from RNA. Are complex living organisms genetically more closely related to DNA virus than RNA virus ?

Posted

No. Relation to viruses is also a kind of a misnomer as functionally they are closer to mobile genetic elements as transposons, plasmids, integrons etc. rather than autonomous organisms.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Since there are not consensus about considering viruses as being live organisms or not, I think we cannot speak about our proximity to viruses. That's just my opinion, however.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

As mentioned by CharonY, viruses might best be considered naturally occurring biological devices, as opposed to living things. They have no metabolic functioning outside of a host cell...and pretty much do nothing but inject genetic material into the cell for the purpose of using the cells machinery to produce the proteins to make more viruses.

 

The "choice" of using RNA over DNA to accomplish this should not infer a superiority or even an evolutionary precedence...any more than a car running on gasoline is superior than one running diesel. It is simply the mechanism by which the virus evolved to accomplish the task of reproduction.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.