Genecks Posted July 22, 2010 Posted July 22, 2010 What are the current ranks associated with levels of post counts? I thought after 1000, a person then became an "Organism."
Spyman Posted July 22, 2010 Posted July 22, 2010 The old user title ladder structure: Lepton (Minimum Posts: 0) Quark (Minimum Posts: 10) Meson (Minimum Posts: 50) Baryon (Minimum Posts: 100) Atom (Minimum Posts: 200) Molecule (Minimum Posts: 400) Protist (Minimum Posts: 750) Organism (Minimum Posts: 1000) Primate (Minimum Posts: 1500) Scientist (Minimum Posts: 3000) Genius (Minimum Posts: 5000) From this old thread: User Titles But we seem to be allowed to put in our own custom titles now with the new SFN, in Profile under Member Title. 1
Genecks Posted July 22, 2010 Author Posted July 22, 2010 The old user title ladder structure: Lepton (Minimum Posts: 0) Quark (Minimum Posts: 10) Meson (Minimum Posts: 50) Baryon (Minimum Posts: 100)... From this old thread: User Titles But we seem to be allowed to put in our own custom titles now with the new SFN, in Profile under Member Title. *gives Spyman compensation* That's excellent. I can actually put in a decent title now.
Royston Posted July 25, 2010 Posted July 25, 2010 But we seem to be allowed to put in our own custom titles now with the new SFN, in Profile under Member Title. I can't seem to find this, although I'm no longer Snail anymore. My new username has nothing to do with 'The League of Gentleman', if anyone asks or cares.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted July 25, 2010 Posted July 25, 2010 Should be under Change Profile Information. But I turned it off a while ago anyway.
Externet Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) Which way does the current members ranking works ? Any link to forum rules about it, please ? If not functioning, why not deleting such username titles ? If functional; what is the scale ? Thanks. Edited July 24, 2013 by Externet
Sayonara Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 The rank list shown in the Admin settings currently looks like this: Lepton 0 Quark 10 Meson 50 Baryon 100 Atom 200 Molecule 400 Protist 750 Organism 1000 Primate 1500 Scientist 3000 Genius 5000 SuperNerd 10000 Postcount Hacker 65535 Certain member groups have the permissions to change this to a custom rank. When you reach the number of posts for the next level, your rank might not change straight away. This is because the forum software carries out some tasks as scheduled batch operations. 2
pears Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 (edited) Why do some users seem to have mismatching post counts and ranking? For example there is a quark with over a 1000 posts. This type of thing seems fairly common. Just wondering. And it always seems to be a lower rank than the post count would suggest. Edited September 20, 2013 by pears
Phi for All Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 Why do some users seem to have mismatching post counts and ranking? For example there is a quark with over a 1000 posts. This type of thing seems fairly common. Just wondering. And it always seems to be a lower rank than the post count would suggest. I don't think posts in the Lounge count toward the rank. We had to do that to keep spammers from posting "LOL, good post!" in the Lounge to gain eligibility to post links and stuff.
Phi for All Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 (edited) Ah - makes sense. Thanks. LOL, good post! Edit to add: Must be the same for this section as the Lounge. This post didn't increase my post count. Edited September 20, 2013 by Phi for All just checking 1
pears Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 (edited) But - if such posts don't count towards post count that doesn't explain the discrepancy. I thought you meant rank and count could get out of sync. What I see regularly is leptons and quarks etc with really high post counts It's not just me that sees them is it? Edited September 20, 2013 by pears
Phi for All Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 If you make 1000 posts and 951 of them are in the areas that don't count towards a science title, you only have 49 posts, making you a Quark. That's my explanation but if you say it's a regular thing then I'm probably wrong. People with 1000 posts should have more of them in the science sections.
pears Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 OK - no your explanation makes sense. I just got confused when you talked about post count not going up in certain sections.
Phi for All Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 No wait! You mean I am not a genius? If you were, you'd know what we mean.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now