CharonY Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 Well I am not sure how serious that is to be taken, however it was published in a peer reviewed journal (low impact, but still). Influenza or not influenza: Analysis of a case of high fever that happened 2000 years ago in Biblical time Kam LE Hon email, Pak C Ng email and Ting F Leung email Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China Virology Journal One final consideration that one might have iswhether the illness was inflicted by a demon or devil.
rigney Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 Well I am not sure how serious that is to be taken, however it was published in a peer reviewed journal (low impact, but still). Influenza or not influenza: Analysis of a case of high fever that happened 2000 years ago in Biblical time Kam LE Hon email, Pak C Ng email and Ting F Leung email Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China Virology Journal If something you believe to be true is plausible, don't hide your thoughts; hang on. But then, search for the truth in its reality and to heck with what someone else thinks? You will eventually find out whether the concept is true or not!
skyhook Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 (edited) If I can choose between (1) researching the bible and (2)researching avian flu on site, drawing stool samples from fowls' vent at some farms, I think I will choose the bible. Edited August 13, 2010 by skyhook
CharonY Posted August 14, 2010 Author Posted August 14, 2010 Well, the paper has been retracted now. Strong indication of lousy editorial work, though.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now