Jump to content

Wave Fxn "collapse" is always "minimum" necessary ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently read, that, when a wave function collapses, to an energy state (say) which is degenerate, having numerous states of the same energy, then the collapse occurs into the subspace spanned by those degenerate energy eigenstates (ie, into a super-position of them?). I got the impression, that it was not into any single degenerate energy state, but into some SP of the group of them. Doesn't this amount to a "partial wave function collapse", like those seen in Renninger Negative Result Experiments ? There seems to be some sense, in which WFC is "as little as possible", collapsing only down into as large a subspace of the original, as can be consistent, with observation / measurements imposed upon the system. Is this (crudely) correct ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.