Jump to content

Our helium reserves are depleting!


Mr Rayon

Recommended Posts

Thank goodness Hydrogen is far more prevelent in earths confines than Helium. Otherwise the world as we know it might only last another two or three hundred years at best. "Capricious" is the only word to describe how wasteful we are in protecting our resources. While we don't need Helium to support life as such, it is a necessity in some modern day mechanichms, helping us to do so. Helium, is becoming rare. How rare? Only time, conservation and "greed" will tell.

Edited by rigney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thank goodness Hydrogen is far more prevelent in earths confines than Helium. Otherwise the world as we know it might only last another two or three hundred years at best. "Capricious" is the only word to describe how wasteful we are in protecting our resources. While we don't need Helium to support life as such, it is a necessity in some modern day mechanichms, helping us to do so. Helium, is becoming rare. How rare? Only time, conservation and "greed" will tell.

and its still wasted in balloons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hydrogen is twice as light as helium, so would make better balloons and better chipmunk voices. But it is also flammable and in the right combination with oxygen or air can be explosive. Which just adds to the fun in my opinion, though I'm sure someone would somehow manage to burn their house down with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm. Maybe it's time to buy a tank of helium. Maybe my descendants 300 years from now will find helium to be a gold mine.

 

I find that if something can go back into the atmosphere where people can readily attempt to collect it, then it's not too much of a problem to lose it. Technology (hopefully) would advance to the point where we can recollect gaseous materials. However, if such a technology could not occur, then surely loss of helium would be a serious issue.

 

Then again, considering the economic costs to develop such technology and allow people to use it? Well, maybe a tank of helium 300 years from now would be worth about what $1500 USD is now these days. I can imagine (not theoretically, though) someone building a catalytic system to recollect helium. If such a systeme could be developed, then surely helium loss would not be such a great issue.

Edited by Genecks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm. Maybe it's time to buy a tank of helium. Maybe my descendants 300 years from now will find helium to be a gold mine.

 

I find that if something can go back into the atmosphere where people can readily attempt to collect it, then it's not too much of a problem to lose it. Technology (hopefully) would advance to the point where we can recollect gaseous materials. However, if such a technology could not occur, then surely loss of helium would be a serious issue.

 

Then again, considering the economic costs to develop such technology and allow people to use it? Well, maybe a tank of helium 300 years from now would be worth about what $1500 USD is now these days. I can imagine (not theoretically, though) someone building a catalytic system to recollect helium. If such a systeme could be developed, then surely helium loss would not be such a great issue.

I'm going to invest in helium

i'll have like 5k tanks in my basement.

 

Hydrogen is twice as light as helium, so would make better balloons and better chipmunk voices. But it is also flammable and in the right combination with oxygen or air can be explosive. Which just adds to the fun in my opinion, though I'm sure someone would somehow manage to burn their house down with it.

anything else light enough to work?

and why can't Hydrogen be used in the technological needs for helium?

Edited by cipher510
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe quite a lot of people are forecasting a great future for airships. For example unmanned military communications etc. Also slow,but cheap transport of heavy loads. I believe you can go sightseeing in an airship around Lucerne, Switzerland at the present time. Whether these aims are a waste of a valuable limited resource I suppose must be debatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then again, considering the economic costs to develop such technology and allow people to use it? Well, maybe a tank of helium 300 years from now would be worth about what $1500 USD is now these days. I can imagine (not theoretically, though) someone building a catalytic system to recollect helium. If such a systeme could be developed, then surely helium loss would not be such a great issue.

 

Once hydrogen fusion is online as a source of power, it would generate helium, I think. I don't know how much helium, though. Now I've been reading that there are different methods of fusion that vary in energy output per unit fuel. I don't get how that's possible since I would think converting hydrogen to helium would always release a fixed amount of energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can imagine (not theoretically, though) someone building a catalytic system to recollect helium.

 

I can't imagine a catalytic way to get helium. But maybe if we get the other stuff... There's oxygen concentrators that remove some of the nitrogen, and I imagine we could get a similar thing that removes the oxygen, and then what is left could be collected by compression/distillation, since they would all be fairly valuable gases.

 

On a related note, I wonder if the atmospheric concentration changes as you go higher. I'd imagine there'd be more helium at higher elevations, so less down where our machines would be.

 

and why can't Hydrogen be used in the technological needs for helium?

 

Helium is special not so much for its lightness but because it is a noble gas (which is also the reason that it is used in balloons, as noble gases aren't flammable). Also the helium nucleus is fairly special, both for helium-4 and helium-3. Also helium cannot liquefy at atmospheric pressure even at absolute zero. This makes it necessary for reaching near absolute zero temps by using liquid helium, as with other gases your gas would liquefy and mess up the refrigeration system. Also liquid helium is a superfluid, although I'm not sure what use that is. Probably for playing with quantum effects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine a catalytic way to get helium. But maybe if we get the other stuff... There's oxygen concentrators that remove some of the nitrogen, and I imagine we could get a similar thing that removes the oxygen, and then what is left could be collected by compression/distillation, since they would all be fairly valuable gases.

 

On a related note, I wonder if the atmospheric concentration changes as you go higher. I'd imagine there'd be more helium at higher elevations, so less down where our machines would be.

 

 

 

Helium is special not so much for its lightness but because it is a noble gas (which is also the reason that it is used in balloons, as noble gases aren't flammable). Also the helium nucleus is fairly special, both for helium-4 and helium-3. Also helium cannot liquefy at atmospheric pressure even at absolute zero. This makes it necessary for reaching near absolute zero temps by using liquid helium, as with other gases your gas would liquefy and mess up the refrigeration system. Also liquid helium is a superfluid, although I'm not sure what use that is. Probably for playing with quantum effects.

so why not neon gas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Helium is special not so much for its lightness but because it is a noble gas (which is also the reason that it is used in balloons, as noble gases aren't flammable). Also the helium nucleus is fairly special, both for helium-4 and helium-3. Also helium cannot liquefy at atmospheric pressure even at absolute zero. This makes it necessary for reaching near absolute zero temps by using liquid helium, as with other gases your gas would liquefy and mess up the refrigeration system. Also liquid helium is a superfluid, although I'm not sure what use that is. Probably for playing with quantum effects.

 

Helium, having a smaller molecular/atomic radius than [ce] H_2 [/ce], also makes it valuable for detecting micro-leaks. If a hole exists, helium is small enough to fit through...Thought I would throw that in.

Edited by mississippichem
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Helium, having a smaller molecular/atomic radius than [ce] H_2 [/ce], also makes it valuable for detecting micro-leaks. If a hole exists, helium is small enough to fit through...Thought I would throw that in.

Which is why those of you planning large tanks of the stuff to pass on to your granchildren are going to have disappointed grandchildren. (OK it won't disperse that fast, but it will get out of even the most solid tank over enough time.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.