CA may suspend GW initiative until after econ recovery

[Pangloss]

California passed a law in 2006 that would have reduced green house emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. (details) But now that the economy has hit the skids, a new proposal would freeze that law until unemployment drops to 5.5% (it's currently over 12%).

 

It's notable that when the emissions law passed in 2006, unemployment in California was at 4.8%. But the proposal has amassed quite a lot of opposition already, ranging from the Governator to unions and eco groups. Backers include oil companies and other business groups. Voters are split on the issue:

 

More than two-thirds of likely voters surveyed said global warming is a "very important" or "somewhat important" issue to them, but only 40% favor the ballot measure and 38% oppose it, reports the Los Angeles Times. One-fifth have yet to take a position. The Times says a ballot initiative with less than 50% support at this point of a campaign typically has trouble, because undecided voters often end up voting no.

 

I don't know who's right, but I think it's an interesting example of how difficult it is to deal with ecological reform when the economy is down. What do you all think?

[Mr Skeptic]

Well in theory it doesn't hurt to skimp a little on some aspects of the environment during tough economic times, but that is only if they really do intend to make up the difference during better times.