TonyMcC Posted October 22, 2010 Posted October 22, 2010 Ah, but this is an exceptional circuit. One terminal of a battery is connected to the inside of the sphere without needing a hole. The other terminal is connected to the outside of the sphere which is coated with magical material which has no resistance. This will provide the radial current! On a more serious note I am sure this must just be an exersise in integration.
swansont Posted October 22, 2010 Posted October 22, 2010 There is no electric field inside in electrostatics. Current flow means it's a dynamic, rather than static, situation. On a more serious note I am sure this must just be an exersise in integration. Undoubtedly. One could also investigate a frustum-shaped resistor, which would at least be physically realizable.
rmw Posted October 22, 2010 Posted October 22, 2010 convert the sphere to an equivalent area elemental sheet, areas of successive sheets increasing with the radius. and make it out of high grade unobtanium, polished to mirror finish so you can see the truth in it.
TonyMcC Posted October 24, 2010 Posted October 24, 2010 Can I suggest the question would have been clearer if the units were given for resistivity. For instance resistivity of copper is approx 1.7 micro ohms -cm or 17 nano ohms-m.
DerekTX Posted October 20, 2011 Posted October 20, 2011 Okay, this is what I have gotten so far.. J=I/A and rho = E/J So E=rho *(I/4*pi*r^2) To get the resistance, I'll take the integral of E R = rho * integral of (1/4*pi*r^2)dr = rho * 1/4pi * ((10^-6)-(10^-2)) = 1.35*10^-11 Your physics is right. Using what you did I got 1.35*10^-3 I can see what you're doing wrong, but not whether darkenlighten or I am correct... You did this: [math]R = \rho \times \frac{1}{4\pi} (10^{-6}-10^{-2})[/math] But the expression you wanted to integrate was [math]R = \rho \int \frac{1}{4\pi r^2} \, dr[/math] The r2 is in the denominator of the integral. darkenlighten: with the radii in units of meters (10-2 and 10-6), I get 10-3 in my answer. Did you change any other values, or are we doing different integrals? This is exactly right. I just don't understand why. to me, in my mind, the formula ought to be [math]R=rho*L/dA[/math] but then I wind up with what darkenlighten has, which is wrong. I don't understand why the L magically goes away and you integrate the entire [math]1/4pir^2[/math] expression. happy dead thread-aversary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now