ponderer Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 I don't know much about PV panels, but it seemed to me that some at least are translucent. For translucent panels. could their efficiency be improved by putting mirrors behind the panels to reflect back to the panels, light that has already passed through?
swansont Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 I suspect it depends on why the panels are translucent. A mirror coating might help, though it might not be cost-effective. If the photons that pass through do so because they cannot be utilized, then reflecting them won't improve things. If efficiency depends on temperature, you might make things worse. Also, if the panels can be saturated, it might do you no good to send more light into them.
ponderer Posted October 28, 2010 Author Posted October 28, 2010 I suspect it depends on why the panels are translucent. A mirror coating might help, though it might not be cost-effective. If the photons that pass through do so because they cannot be utilized, then reflecting them won't improve things. If efficiency depends on temperature, you might make things worse. Also, if the panels can be saturated, it might do you no good to send more light into them. I doubt saturation is a problem. Parabolic mirrors are already used on the front side in concentrator arrays.
CaptainPanic Posted October 28, 2010 Posted October 28, 2010 PV panels normally have back contacts of metal - just a regular sheet of metal, which will have the same effect as a mirror. If those back contacts deliberately were left out (I think that complicates the production, and increases the price), then the goal of the panel may be to actually let some light through... for architectural reasons, it can be interesting to have glass that partially blocks the sunlight, but lets some through.
Dune Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 The O.P. may find this link helpful. I beleive the thin film tech is more effective than the solid panels, and cheaper to manufacture. http://www2.dupont.com/Apollo/en_HK/index.html
CaptainPanic Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 The O.P. may find this link helpful. I beleive the thin film tech is more effective than the solid panels, and cheaper to manufacture. http://www2.dupont.com/Apollo/en_HK/index.html Your post seems to conflict with the data I found on wikipedia about the solar cell efficiency.
Dune Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 Indeed, it does appear so. I will have to have memory checked.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now