Encrypted Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 Ya but hard ones are easy to crack.... Simpler one sort of fool people into thinking it's something really complicated and make them miss the obvious answer..... I have almost completed my new challenge! Encrypted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 Ya but hard ones are easy to crack.... By that logic cracking an RSA cipher should be relatively simple But I do get what you're saying. These are more brain-teasers than codes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Encrypted Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 Yes. That is true...if a computer were working on this...my code would be gone. But one of the rules of my puzzles are: NO COMPUTERS PLEASE!!! Encrypted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 When you say "All numbers are rounded to the second decimal place", does this mean that 5.33 is supposed to be [math]5 \tfrac{2}{3}[/math]? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 I think he means it's rounded to the nearest hundredth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Encrypted Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Yes i mean it is rounded to the hundredth decimal place. Encrypted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 so 6.67 is 6.70 or just 7? I told you my maths was lousey! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodhound Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 6.67 should be anywhere from. 6.67 to 6.674 i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 I could be wrong, but I recon 17.00 is the letter `E` Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Demosthenes- Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 "No one will ever break my codem ha ha' date='"? That's including typos, otherwise it might have read "Mp pmr eo;; rbrt ntrsl ,u vpfr. js js/", which would have been decoded to "No one will ever break my code, ha ha." We should start an official code tread for this kind of thing. [/quote'] wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 it`s a -1 offset, that`s all ) YT looks for more in his "Borg Encryption" manual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodhound Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Klingon Encryption Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Klingon Encryption Heh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 Huh? "Your Mama drinks tea like a pregnant Targ" I don`t get it? LOL ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodhound Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 i think that means "Killing SPREE!!!!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 OIC Damn this Universal Translator! (probably low power cells?) Google Corps 2075 gave me a 100% guarantee to its accuracy and a battery life of 50 years (at less than light speed conditions, heavy rain or Sony Walkmans). trust me to buy a dud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodhound Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 i usually buy DUDES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 if "Dudes" are anything like "Mates", I`m sure YOU wouldn`t need them LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 You're both wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Encrypted Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 I said that all the number have been rounded by me to the hundredth decimal place. 6.67 used to be: 6.66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666...... That should clear things up. Encrypted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rakdos Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 I have a code for you to break CODE:0001 1111 0101 0000 1101 1101 0110 0001 1101 0011 0011 1100 0000 1000 1110 1011 1111 0001 0101 1100 1100 1001 1110 1100 0001 0101 1101 1001 1001 1001 0111 1110 0011 1010 1011 0111 0101 0101 0001 0011 1000 0000 1101 0110 0011 0000: End Code. It is in binary and its a message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 So far, no luck with any of the codes. I'm thinking about them though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Encrypted Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 Hmmmm... Seems that my newest code is goind to be unbreakable for a long time... Encrypted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5614 Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 i havent tried yet, though im guessing theres something to do with the fact that all figures are to 2DP, presumably no needed information is lost by this process, i think what he was trying to say by it was that 5.33 is actually 5 and a third, and the other one 6.67 was actually 6 and two thirds. i'll work on it another time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 Hmmmm... Seems that my newest code is goind to be unbreakable for a long time... Encrypted Well, given time and effort I think I'd probably break it. However, it's not been the first thing on my mind recently. Plus, your ciphering algorithm could have 20 steps for all I know, and there's only so much of my free time I'm willing to give to crack a code Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now