Shell theory versus dark energy

[Arac15]

Hi

Instead of dark energy [2] driving matter [5] outward in an unknown way, it is more convenient to

state that is pulled by / accellerated by distant matter. [6][7][8]

 

This distant matter could be pushed off as a dust shell in the first hot phase of the big bang expansion proces.

 

This distant matter is than forcing the universal cooled dark matter to move and to expand.

 

The distant matter could behave like the Oort belt [10]

It could be that this distant matter was not superheated because of the one sided pressure, so this matter

could be also mostly dark and in its ancient pre- big bang form.

 

The observed universe expansion is than accellerated by the expression a=G*SQR(M/D) [Derived from [11],[12] non relativistic], so is independant of local matter mass.

G is the gravitational constant

D is the distance between the two masses

M is the distant mass

 

The increase or decrease of accelleration is dependant on the decrease or increase respectively of the distance of the external matter to our known universe.

In time this distance from the origin could have varied dependant on the first phase of heating up the ancient soup, next the cooling down, and third the mere dependance on time it takes to propagate the gravitational waves with the speed of light.

 

 

This theory could be examened by the following actions;

1. For the red shifts of galaxies measured by the SDSS [20] a model could be made to to fit this theory, however

the cosmological redshift has to be compensated for the distance, time and direction to get a vector direction of expansion.

2. Measurement of the weak exterial remnant gravitational force giving our location a velocity and accelleration in 13.10^9 years time.

The compensation of the local solar system masses and galaxy will be very difficult for making a force measurement as a function of RA and DEC.

(this measurement is totally different from the LIGO [21] alternating gravity wave test, trying to find binary blackhole rotation.)

 

Please give your arguments if the postulate above is, or is not possible.

 

 

 

 

refences

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation

[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

[8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe

]10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oort_cloud

[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion

[12] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation

[20] http://www.sdss.org

[21] www.ligo.org

[granpa]

http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using%20the%20spell%20checker

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_theorem#Inside_a_shell

[Spyman]

The Big Bang was not an explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty universe.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang