liambob1 Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 In our instrumentation lab we have been using a polarimeter on salicylic acid tp measure the degree it rotates plane polarised light, I understand that it does this and the applications of this but Im confused about HOW it does this, I know it has something to do the vibration of molecules. If someone could help me clear this up I would appreciate It.
swansont Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 You can view a linear polarization as the superposition of circular polarization in opposite directions, with the phase between them dictating the direction of the linear polarization. The material has a different index for the two circular polarizations, so it induces an additional phase difference between them as the light travels through. This results in a different direction of the linear polarization. There has to be some asymmetry in the molecular structure that makes it preferentially interact with one polarization.
John Cuthber Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 Salicylic acid doesn't rotate the plane of polarised light. It can't It has a mirror symmetry plane.
liambob1 Posted December 4, 2010 Author Posted December 4, 2010 We did the test of various substances, salacylic was one, we used methyl orange among others
mississippichem Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 We did the test of various substances, salacylic was one, we used methyl orange among others 2-hydroxybenzoic acid, right? John Cuthber is correct. Salicyclic acid is not a chiral compound. It is superposable on its own mirror image, and more formally it displays a [math] \sigma[/math]-mirror plane in the "plane" of the benzene ring. Try it for yourself. Try to draw a pair of enantiomers for salicyclic acid, you'll find that it can't be done.
John Cuthber Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 For the record, methyl orange isn't chiral either.
liambob1 Posted December 5, 2010 Author Posted December 5, 2010 I checked back in my reports to the experiment and the solution we tested was a sucrose solution, I sought help not to get my errors thrown in my face John
mississippichem Posted December 5, 2010 Posted December 5, 2010 I checked back in my reports to the experiment and the solution we tested was a sucrose solution, I sought help not to get my errors thrown in my face John Any questions about the sucrose solution? I doubt John Cuthber was trying to throw something in your face though. He may be terse, but he just wants the correct information to propagate through the forum as it it his responsibility as a resident expert; and he knows what he is talking about. No need to take offense, everyone gets corrected sometimes, even experts by other experts.
liambob1 Posted December 5, 2010 Author Posted December 5, 2010 As part of the experiment we used an acid to dehydrate the sucrose and see did this effect the rotary power , the result was inconclusive, what should have happened? And I know he wasnt 'twas silly of me
John Cuthber Posted December 5, 2010 Posted December 5, 2010 You might want to have a look at this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_sugar_syrup#Chemical_reaction_of_the_inversion
liambob1 Posted December 5, 2010 Author Posted December 5, 2010 Thank you very much, it's greatly appreciated
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now