Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

smile.gifv=c*(m'2+2m'm)1/2/ (m'+m)

v - speed

c - light speed

m' - mass of kinetic energy(relative mass)

m - gravitation mass

for object with gravitation mass: m'=[1/(1-v2/c2)1/2 -1]m

Posted (edited)

At least the units are right (all too often this isn't the case when someone posts a formula here), but unless it comes from a derivation, it doesn't really have any meaning.

 

that is, how is it any different from: [math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m'^4+2m'^2m^2}}{m'^2+m^2}[/math]? units cancel correctly again, but I just completely made it up and it really doesn't have much meaning at all.

 

So, where does your idea come from, and what does it really mean?

Edited by Bignose
Posted

Let's see:

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m'^2+2m'm}}{m'+m}[/math]

 

and

 

[math]m'= \left ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}} -1 \right ) m [/math]

 

At first, to keep things from being unwieldy, we'll say that

 

[math] \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/math]

 

So we can say that

 

[math]m' = m \gamma - m [/math]

 

Putting this into the first equation we get

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{\left( m \gamma - m \right)^2+2\left (m \gamma - m \right ) m}}{m \gamma - m+m}[/math]

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{\left( m \gamma - m \right)^2+2\left (m \gamma - m \right ) m}}{m \gamma }[/math]

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m^2\gamma^2-2m^2 \gamma + m^2 + 2m^2 \gamma -2m^2}}{m \gamma}[/math]

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m^2\gamma^2 - m^2 }}{m \gamma}[/math]

 

[math]v^2 = c^2 \frac{m^2\gamma^2 - m^2 }{m^2 \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math]v^2 = c^2 \frac{\gamma^2 - 1 }{ \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math]\frac{v^2}{c^2} = \frac{\gamma^2 - 1 }{ \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math]\frac{v^2}{c^2} = 1-\frac{ 1 }{ \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math] \frac{v^2}{c^2} = 1- \left ( 1- \frac {v^2}{c^2} \right )[/math]

 

[math] \frac{v^2}{c^2} = \frac {v^2}{c^2}[/math]

 

[math] v^2 = v^2 [/math]

 

[math]v = v[/math]

 

Hardly an earth-shattering revelation. And not very surprising, considering that your initial equation solving for v relied on a term (m'), that itself relied on the value of v.

Posted

At least the units are right (all too often this isn't the case when someone posts a formula here), but unless it comes from a derivation, it doesn't really have any meaning.

 

that is, how is it any different from: [math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m'^4+2m'^2m^2}}{m'^2+m^2}[/math]? units cancel correctly again, but I just completely made it up and it really doesn't have much meaning at all.

 

So, where does your idea come from, and what does it really mean?

It comes from a derivation:

total energy2=(mc2)2+(cp)2

Einstein's kinetic energy=m'c2

This formulae I have used.If you have a defined gravitation mass and a defined turned mass into energy then you have a defined speed.Thank you for your discussion.

 

 

 

Let's see:

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m'^2+2m'm}}{m'+m}[/math]

 

and

 

[math]m'= \left ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}} -1 \right ) m [/math]

 

At first, to keep things from being unwieldy, we'll say that

 

[math] \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/math]

 

So we can say that

 

[math]m' = m \gamma - m [/math]

 

Putting this into the first equation we get

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{\left( m \gamma - m \right)^2+2\left (m \gamma - m \right ) m}}{m \gamma - m+m}[/math]

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{\left( m \gamma - m \right)^2+2\left (m \gamma - m \right ) m}}{m \gamma }[/math]

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m^2\gamma^2-2m^2 \gamma + m^2 + 2m^2 \gamma -2m^2}}{m \gamma}[/math]

 

[math]v = c \frac{\sqrt{m^2\gamma^2 - m^2 }}{m \gamma}[/math]

 

[math]v^2 = c^2 \frac{m^2\gamma^2 - m^2 }{m^2 \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math]v^2 = c^2 \frac{\gamma^2 - 1 }{ \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math]\frac{v^2}{c^2} = \frac{\gamma^2 - 1 }{ \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math]\frac{v^2}{c^2} = 1-\frac{ 1 }{ \gamma^2}[/math]

 

[math] \frac{v^2}{c^2} = 1- \left ( 1- \frac {v^2}{c^2} \right )[/math]

 

[math] \frac{v^2}{c^2} = \frac {v^2}{c^2}[/math]

 

[math] v^2 = v^2 [/math]

 

[math]v = v[/math]

 

Hardly an earth-shattering revelation. And not very surprising, considering that your initial equation solving for v relied on a term (m'), that itself relied on the value of v.

You have connected the universal formula with the local formula. Good job in the appropriate place.tongue.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.