toruk Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 What would be your strongest argument that time dilation is true?
ydoaPs Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 What would be your strongest argument that time dilation is true? It has been experimentally confirmed.
toruk Posted December 11, 2010 Author Posted December 11, 2010 It has been experimentally confirmed. Best reference?
Zarnaxus Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Experimental_confirmation look at the experimental confirmation section, where it describes the numurous tests confirming time dilation. (yes i did just state something obvious)
toruk Posted December 11, 2010 Author Posted December 11, 2010 Very good thanks a lot. It answers the question - what do you do with someone that wants to argue all day time dilation is not true.
owl Posted January 27, 2011 Posted January 27, 2011 What is the difference between these two statements: "Time dilation is true as proven by many experiments." And Clocks "tick" at different rates in different inertial circumstances, as proven by many experiments." BTW, I know that the "lifespan of muons" increases in "different inertial circumstrances" and that GPS clocks require correction according to their different "circumstances"... but this is a question about the ontology of time as a variable entity as contrasted with clocks as variable measuring devices. The standard, matter of fact statement, "Time dilation is true," ignores the above distinction. Owl -1
swansont Posted January 28, 2011 Posted January 28, 2011 What is the difference between these two statements: "Time dilation is true as proven by many experiments." And Clocks "tick" at different rates in different inertial circumstances, as proven by many experiments." BTW, I know that the "lifespan of muons" increases in "different inertial circumstrances" and that GPS clocks require correction according to their different "circumstances"... but this is a question about the ontology of time as a variable entity as contrasted with clocks as variable measuring devices. The standard, matter of fact statement, "Time dilation is true," ignores the above distinction. Owl Clocks "tick" at different rates in different inertial circumstances, as proven by many experiments. does not specifically address the issue of whether it's a mechanical issue of the clock. But this issue has not been ignored — different types of clocks have been tested, and they all show the time dilation effect. So we conclude that the timing changes are due to the effects of relativity.
ajb Posted January 28, 2011 Posted January 28, 2011 ...what do you do with someone that wants to argue all day time dilation is not true. Punch them in the face. No, violence is not the answer here. All you can do is suggest they read up on special relativity and give them some references to the experiments that confirm relativity. There are plenty of them, as well as many other more indirect tests. If that does not help, then just walk away.
swansont Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 ! Moderator Note Ontology tangent has been moved to http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/54529-ontology-of-time/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now