kumarevo Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 Mathematics as we know is limited, there are mistakes. The first error of mathematics: length (area, volume) consists of the points. Look at the evidence which shows that the length includes the length, size of area,volume by volume. Then you wonder what is the point. (larger image) I am a mathematician, inventor. My basis for an axiom (definition point, along a natural). Everything else is proved in the space, get to know my math, expand their knowledge. MS.0. The basic axiom. Definition point. Natural along. Beginning (end) is longer than the natural point. Natural along with two points, the lengthbetween points. (small image) To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence). kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com
kumarevo Posted December 15, 2010 Author Posted December 15, 2010 MS.1. Connecting natural longer. Natural longer connecting points. Types of mergers: (2.1) (3.1) (4.1 )..... To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence). kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com
kumarevo Posted December 15, 2010 Author Posted December 15, 2010 MS.2. Fit natural cycles along. Naturally along the lines. Uniform (finite, infinite) cycle, the forms (2.1) (3.1) (4.1 ),.. The combined (final, infinite) cycle, combinations of natural connection longer. example (small image) All these cycles are natural along the line.
Dak Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 ! Moderator Note kumarevo: Please keep all these posts on... lines and stuff... in one thread please. Also, your last post made little-to-no sense.
kumarevo Posted December 16, 2010 Author Posted December 16, 2010 MS.3. Cycle connection (2.1) the direction AB. Along. The cycle of connection (2.1 (final, infinite)) in the direction AB. Along the required form of natural line (series connection (2.1) the direction of AB), can be finite or infinite To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence). kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com MS.4. Cycle signs. The main set of numbers-natural numbers. Numerical along. The first point (A), connecting the points (B, C, D,...) in a cycle of (2.1 (the direction AB,infinite (along numeric)))replace the cycle of signs: (0,1), (0,1,2), (0,1,2,3), (0,1,2,3,4), (0,1,2,3, 4.5),(0,1,2,3,4,5,6), (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,, (0,1,2,3,4,5,6 , 7,8,9), (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, A), (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, A, B ),.... , cycle signs we'll call numbers. In today's applied mathematics series characters: (0.1), (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7),(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 , 9), (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, A, B, C, D, E, F). We will apply (0,1,2,3,4,5, 6,7,8,9) because he isa mass use. Set the current math axiom, mine is a basic set of numbers (N = {0,1,2,3,4,5,...}. To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence). kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com
D H Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 Also, your last post made little-to-no sense. Just the last one? Really? None of this makes sense. kumarevo, what exactly are you trying to say here? What exactly is your point?
kumarevo Posted December 16, 2010 Author Posted December 16, 2010 Just the last one? Really? None of this makes sense. kumarevo, what exactly are you trying to say here? What exactly is your point? point is explained (MS.0)
michel123456 Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 I understand nothing. Don't shout. Try to explain better. Mathematics as we know is limited, there are mistakes. The first error of mathematics: length (area, volume) consists of the points. Look at the evidence which shows that the length includes the length, size of area,volume by volume. Then you wonder what is the point. Are you saying that a point do not exist? because a point has a length?
kumarevo Posted December 17, 2010 Author Posted December 17, 2010 (edited) Are you saying that a point do not exist? because a point has a length? I (MS.0) showed evidence that the length (area, volume) does not consist of points.Point there (I have defined MS.0). __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ MS.5. Copying from the basic set of numbers into another set of skup.Re-set. From the basic set of numbers are copied ((;)with repetition without repetition, finally, endless, combined) in the second set. Re-set (; is the release of a set of number brackets (code sets, = sign) to another form of description set.Re-set together with a number, just remove the brackets (code set, character =). MS.6. Re-set set- frequency. Sign connecting _ (minimum 2) re-set sets. Same set of numbers (minimum 2) to re-set in frequency. Form: a (number) f (mark frequency), b (as there are same number), b (end frequency). Simple form. To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence). kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com MS.7.Re-set set-srcko. Set of numbers (minimum 2) where the distance to the furthest point to the same re-set in srcko. Form:a (initial number), b (distance), c (final number, if there is srcko final, unless there is srcko is infinite). Simple form. MS.8.Re-set set-frequency + pendant. Re-set meeting (frequency) joined the other numbers (minimum 1) that are not in re-set frequency. Form (number) f (mark frequency), b (as there are same number), b (end frequency), c (pendant-number). Simple form. Edited December 17, 2010 by kumarevo
D H Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 What exactly are you trying to prove? So far, what you have is complete and utter nonsense.
mississippichem Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 kumarevo, you should flesh out your prose to better explain your multitude of lines and charts. Also, somehow tying this into some established mathematics might help. You should explain your reasoning concisely within your next few posts or, if prior precedent serves, posters and more importantly the mods will lose patience with you. Check through the past archives. People that tout their speculations without adequately explaining themselves tend to not last long.
CaptainPanic Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 I get the feeling that somewhere on the internet, a computer is really, really close to passing the Turing test. It took 12 replies to call it.
Dave Posted December 24, 2010 Posted December 24, 2010 I'm closing this thread - quite frankly the posts make no sense.
Recommended Posts