Emily2025 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 This article, in New Scientist magazine says so, because it says that they are a "universal donor": http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16386-neanderthals-might-have-made-good-blood-donors.html However, it does not specify anywhere that the blood type was rhesus negative, other than its referring to the neanderthal's blood type as a "universal donor", group O. However, only O negative is a universal donor. I could not find any other information on the web verifying that neanderthals are rhesus negative, only that 2 of them were found to have blood group O. I would love to somehow find out more about this, and if they were rhesus negative or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now