What the the drawbacks of an 51,464,450,000,000 Hz FEL?

[Green Xenon]

Hi:

 

I recently posted something similar messages. I apologize profusely if anyone is annoyed.

 

Infra-red C spectrum = 100,000 nm to 3,000 nm

 

100,000 nm = 2.9979e12 Hz = 2,997,900,000,000 Hz

 

3,000 nm = 9.9931e13 Hz = 99,931,000,000,000 Hz

 

Arithmetic mean of IR-C spectrum = 51,464,450,000,000 Hz = 5825.23388 nm

 

Due to the above and the inability of the device in http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/53451-wide-spectrum-irc-emission-device/ to exist, I'm now thinking of a free-electron 51,464,450,000,000 Hz laser for the same applications of that previous IR-C emitting device.

 

In addition, the emission of the 51,464,450,000,000 Hz light from this laser is constant, non-flickering and non-pulsatile – in other words, continuous-wave. The shape of the laser emitting this radiation is square or rectangular depending on the application. In any case, the laser faces downward from the ceiling -- or other "top" -- of an enclosure and emits the IR-C light *downwards* only.

 

My question is, what would be the disadvantages – besides the cost and bulkiness – of using this hypothetical free-electron 51,464,450,000,000 Hz for the applications discussed in http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/53451-wide-spectrum-irc-emission-device/ ?

 

Once again, I hope no one is upset as a result of my messages.

 

 

Thanks & Happy Holidays,

 

Green Xenon

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

Didn't we do this already?

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/53632-monochromatic-ir-c-device-for-radiant-heating/