Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

but is this steps right?

36.65=20n =>

=>n=log2036.65

No, this step is incorrect.

 

you have

36.65=20n

first put the unknown on the left:

20n = 36.65

to get rid of the exponent you can take the log of 20n. Make sure you do the same to both sides.

n log20 = log36.65

then you should be able to find n.

Edited by Blahah
Posted (edited)

hypervalent_iodine and Blahah, you are both incorrect. Spyros, you're answer is correct; the guys above didn't notice you took the base 20 logarithm of both sides, not the natural/base 10 log:

 

[math]36.65 = 20^n[/math]

 

[math]\log_{20}(36.65) = \log_{20}(20^n)[/math]

 

[math]\log_{20}(36.65) = n \cdot \log_{20}(20)[/math]

 

[math]n = \log_{20}(36.65) \approx 1.202181[/math]

Edited by Shadow
Posted (edited)

Whoops sorry - Shadow's right, I didn't notice that yours was log base 20. However, I think my solution is still correct as well.

 

eidt: ugh, I also formatted the text wrongly in my answer. Corrected now. Maybe I should wait until I'm better at maths before advising others!

Edited by Blahah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.