Jump to content

Is energy infinite?


luke

Recommended Posts

Blossom - does that really follow? If total energy is infinite how come I am slightly chilly in my office; surely if it was infinite, after everything else was heated up to a mad form of plasma there would still be enough energy to keep my office nice and toasty. I would be more likely to say that on a cosmological scale that total energy is zero - ie everything balances out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently, it is uncertain whether the universe is infinite or finite. If it is infinite, I cannot find a reason why the total matter-energy within it has to be finite. Any part of that kind of universe will have a finite amount of density of matter-energy, which is why you, imatfaal, could still be slightly chilly in your office even with an infinite amount of matter-energy. Although there are some problems, like a vacuum supposedly having an infinite energy density. A singularity is also calculated to have an infinite energy density. These infinite densities, however, could just be a result of the unfinished theories and laws we use to calculate them with. In other words, with a quantum theory or supersymmetrical theory of gravity, possibly m-theory, we can maybe calculate what happens within a singularity without getting infinite densities (or infinite probability of things happening, but that's a different story).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never like it when someone 'questions a question' but I'll be guitly of it:

 

Without a grand unified theory, we aren't even sure what energy is. Also 'infinite' needs to be defined.

 

Context is needed to answer the question. The answers above make sense in their own context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

100 years ago the popular belief in science was that the physical universe was infinite in all directions. The science is called plasma physics, and is better known today as the steady state theory.

 

 

 

Einstein proposed a definition for the space-time continuum in the steady state theory as the material universe extending for infinity into the past without beginning, and forward into the future without end.

 

 

 

If you believe this definition is correct, then you are considered to be a steady state theorist who doesn’t believe in the big bang. You would explain the evidence of the microwave background as low temperature hydrogen, and you would believe energy is infinite.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.