Phi for All Posted September 29, 2004 Author Posted September 29, 2004 Many people dislike the negative ads that only seek to sling mud. I think a large part of getting big business out of politics will be to reform campaign laws to make a more level playing field. Should the candidates be restricted in their mud-slinging?
Pangloss Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Oh I see. Silly me, I lost track of the thread! I'm not sure I have an answer for you, but in an obvious and slightly embarassed effort to keep the conversation going, I'll mention something else. (grin) I think an under-recognized impact of the present 527 situation is that it further insulates the candidates from negative advertising. They don't have to do as much of it because the 527s are doing it for them. Furthermore, when they DO present some of it, it doesn't look as bad because it's tame in comparison with what the 527s are doing.
Pangloss Posted September 30, 2004 Posted September 30, 2004 This article at FactCheck.org kinda expands on that idea a bit: http://www.factcheck.org/SpecialReports.aspx?docID=137
Phi for All Posted September 30, 2004 Author Posted September 30, 2004 Cool! I love simple things that have multiple positive repercussions.
Mad Mardigan Posted September 30, 2004 Posted September 30, 2004 A big problem with politics is people often attack the person, not the subject. It happens in all debates it seems. If you cant discredit a topic, then discredit the source.
Phi for All Posted October 4, 2004 Author Posted October 4, 2004 A big problem with politics is people often attack the person, not the subject. It happens in all debates it seems. If you cant discredit a topic, then discredit the source.Too true. The ad hominem attack has been applied to every president and presidential candidate that I can remember. So where did the idea of "spin-doctoring" stem from? Was it an offshoot of business marketing or does it have it's roots in politics? Because I think a big part of spin is attacking the person rather than the subject or the idea.
revprez Posted October 5, 2004 Posted October 5, 2004 Imo, capitalism works best with lots of competition, and the bigger businesses get, the less competiton there is. One of their biggest threats is their influence in politics. Any thoughts on how we can curb this unfair influence? Sure. Reduce the state's influence over the private sector.
budullewraagh Posted October 5, 2004 Posted October 5, 2004 that's not likely. my answer is socialism
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now