Need Feedback - 4th Dimension Gravity Theory

[miked]

I had considered working through on my own, but decided i'm more interested in advancing the theory than protecting it. If possible, I would like some feedback or insight on where to look at for the major holes in this before investing the time / resources on the details. Any thoughts?

 

Is there any string research being done on quantum level particles and their movement or transition through dimensions?

 

 

Theory Summary:

The following describes how gravity is unified into relativity at a quantum level.

 

To sum up, the 4^th dimension (not considering space/time as the 4th dimension) is scale. It is very simple to understand and visualize 'scale', this should not be confused with relativity though. Relative Scaling states that from Earth I can observe a tiny spec of light in the night sky, but as I move 50 million light years closer, that spec becomes a galaxy, and another 50 million light years close the galaxy is too large to visualize but I see stars (microcosm of the galaxy). Rather than a 3 dimensional universe, we need to consider that we actually feel the effects of this 4 dimensional universe in every day life ~ gravity.

 

The 4^th Dimension of scale pertains to particles as they enter this 4-brane state (string theory) on a quantum level. The individual particle's energy is scaled to the Newtonian universe we live in, dissipating to a very weak force. The amount of energy doesn't scale, it spreads out over a very large area (equal to the scaling effect). When the binding energy that holds quantum particles together is scaled out to our Newtonian universe we live in, the same force (albeit very weak) is felt as gravity. It takes many of these 4-brane state particles conglomerated together to form enough force to be felt as gravity. In clusters where more particles exists, there is higher amounts of gravity, due to larger percentage of particles entering this 4-brane state. Black holes have a higher than usual percentage of particles entering this 4-brane state.

 

 

 

 

The Theory Predicts:

 

1) On a small relative scale, there are fluctuations or irregularities in gravity which become more apparent as you move further away from a large gravity source. This is due to the thinning of particles further away that are entering this 4-brane state. This may be difficult to measure due to the quantum duality nature of the particles, may have to have simultaneous measurements

 

2) There will be a constant involved as to the scaling effect of the particles. This constant should consider if another force is acting on this effect

 

 

3) There is a mathematical link between the number of particles entered into the 4-brane state (nature / density of particles), influences that transition particles into this state, the scaling effects of the particles, and the force of gravity.

Edited March 29, 2011 by miked

[Bignose]

To sum up, the 4^th dimension (not considering space/time as the 4th dimension) is scale. It is very simple to understand and visualize 'scale', this should not be confused with relativity though. Relative Scaling states that from Earth I can observe a tiny spec of light in the night sky, but as I move 50 million light years closer, that spec becomes a galaxy, and another 50 million light years close the galaxy is too large to visualize but I see stars (microcosm of the galaxy).

 

This scaling can be described using the 'regular' 3 dimensions of space. The 'scale' of something is a function of your distance from it and the size of that something. I don't see a need to create a 4th dimension when what you are describing can be adequately described using the commonly defined 3 dimensions.

 

 

3) There is a mathematical link between the number of particles entered into the 4-brane state (nature / density of particles), influences that transition particles into this state, the scaling effects of the particles, and the force of gravity.

 

OK, can you post this mathematical link?

[Steve S]

Amazing! I actually did a search to see if anyone had ever worked on the idea that gravity exists as a particle in the fourth dimension. Explaining why the force of gravity is weaker than all the forces. It could explain dark matter. (Could merely be masses of gravity particles just out of our ability to see, hiding in the 4^th dimension. ) I would love to hear more and share thoughts and ideas.

 

 

[Thinker3]

Wondering if you are still around. I have been pondering a very simlar therory of my own and I too wanted to keep it secret for the same reasons. Namely that there is a 4th dimension and it is scale for lack of a better term. From that I feel gravity is a force moving fourth dimensionally. To address the argument Bignose has that you dont need to create a 4th dimension to explain the perception you speak of is like telling a slightly 3 dimensional being. (who mostly operates 2 dimensionally) that moving diagonal slightly in the 3rd dimension is not a reason to have a 3rd dimension because your still moving diagonally. (Roll your eyes here). Not to mention the reason to create the fourth dimension is to explain why gravity appears as a weak force. (The extra energy has gone into the 4 dimension which i beleive is not as readily observable to us because I beleive we operate in the 4th dimension just not as easily as we do in the 3rd dimension). Big can of worms but I do have some observable examples. (A Teceract being one....kind of stares you in the face really). You are not the only one thinking like this mike but I do wonder who else is doesn't seem like it on the radar. When we fricken use it daily. (Think scaling down of electronic devices and smaller but more powerful?) Its a rabbit hole that needs studied and better explained and utilized. Love to talk with others about this especially ones with better math knowledge than I.

 

http://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Scale_dimension here is a link that may help just found it. Looks facinating so far.

[ACG52]

[Bignose]

To address the argument Bignose has that you dont need to create a 4th dimension to explain the perception you speak of is like telling a slightly 3 dimensional being. (who mostly operates 2 dimensionally) that moving diagonal slightly in the 3rd dimension is not a reason to have a 3rd dimension because your still moving diagonally. (Roll your eyes here).

 

This doesn't answer why 'scale' needs to be a 4th dimension when it is perfectly well described by the 3 space dimensions we have now. I have no problem introducing additional dimensions when they describe something that can't be described without a new dimension.

 

For example, 3 dimensions isn't enough to describe a particle's position and speed. For example, I can have a particle at time t located a (0,0,0), but that doesn't tell me the speed. It could be moving at (0, 1, 0) m/s or (100, 100, 1000) m/s. Hence to fully describe that particle's position and velocity, I need a 6-vector (x, y, z, vx, vy, vz).

 

But, I don't see how scale falls into that example. The scale of something is a function of the three spatial dimensions -- I don't need to invoke an extra dimension to handle it.

 

-------------------------

 

also, holy thread necromancy, Batman. Did you see the original dates of the 1st posts?