Moontanman Posted May 15, 2011 Posted May 15, 2011 IMO we are getting out of tracks. The prior question is wether gravity has an influence over size of living forms. Moontanman argues it has an influence IIRC. He says which I characterize a blind stupid statement, giving the childish example of Antoine's lightman. In response, Moontanman says I am siliness personified, which statement does not give an answer to the prior question. Could anyone here give an insight? I gave you some insight, you rejected it in favor of your intuition, I never said that you were silliness personified I said your idea that intuition trumps the cube square law is silliness personified: my exact words Yes, like many ideas taken to it's extreme your idea and the fictitious story used to promote it is indeed absurd as is your method of debate, merely waving your hands and saying something cannot be true because of your intuition is not science or even debate, it is just silliness personified.
mooeypoo Posted May 15, 2011 Posted May 15, 2011 ! Moderator Note Please keep the debate civil and respect the people who take time to participate with you.I also must remind everyone that the Speculation forum follows the same rules as the rest of ScienceForums content follows. Personal gut feelings and intuition and belief is not evidence, is not treated as evidence, and is not good enough to convince of one side's point.Drop the attitude and start arguing civilly. Please.
swansont Posted May 23, 2011 Posted May 23, 2011 ! Moderator Note Discussion on reduced gravity moved to its own thread http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/57318-gravity-theory-of-mass-extinction/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now