MolecularMan14 Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 Ok, I know this again, is not my field of expertise, however, I would very much like to know more about anti-matter. Basically, I would like to know if there is anti-matter for every element? Since there is a Mg, is there and Anti-Mg, or an anti-plutonium, or an anti-gold? When matter and anti-matter collide, does it release energy? Can the energy be harvested, or used practically? Anything more to add would be helpful! Thanks much!
Gilded Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 I guess you could make an anti-element of anything really (I think only H has been made, though). And about the collision thing, yes, annihilation happens (both particles are converted to energy). And yes, it could be harvested, yet making anti-matter requires so much energy that it's useless to then turn it into energy. If there was a natural source of it, anti-matter would be a tremendous energy source. I personally can't see any use for it except a) having much energy in a small package, for example using anti-matter engines in spacecraft (if you turned a mass of 1kg into energy, you could drive a car with that energy for over 100 000 years) or b) using it as weaponry, which would of course be a terrible misuse of it.
MolecularMan14 Posted October 7, 2004 Author Posted October 7, 2004 how does one create anti-matter. What is the process of making an anti-element?
aguy2 Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 They are doing this at the Cern Switzerland Particle Acellerator. They have an excellent web site at http://Http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/ aguy2 "There is a relatively high probability that we and the universe around us are involved in an ongoing, staged process of self-creation; wherein and whereby the creator of us and the universe around us is attempting to create itself."
Gilded Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 I turned green with envy when students of another Finnish high school got to visit CERN. :<
jdurg Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 I can't really imagine being able to contain anti-matter since it would just annihilate anything it was contained in. hehe.
swansont Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 I can't really imagine being able to contain anti-matter since it would just annihilate anything it was contained in. hehe. Magnetic trap. Doesn't touch anything for a while, if you've got a good vacuum.
MolecularMan14 Posted October 8, 2004 Author Posted October 8, 2004 how many types of anti-matter are there? Is there one for every element?
Firedragon52 Posted October 8, 2004 Posted October 8, 2004 how many types of anti-matter are there? Is there one for every element? They have only created anti-Hydrogen so far.
MolecularMan14 Posted October 8, 2004 Author Posted October 8, 2004 hmm...how exactly was that done? Im a very curious kinda guy. It truly is a very interesting topic
Gilded Posted October 8, 2004 Posted October 8, 2004 I bet it was done just by shooting positrons at anti-protons, at CERN.
swansont Posted October 8, 2004 Posted October 8, 2004 hmm...how exactly was that done?Im a very curious kinda guy. It truly is a very interesting topic Here you go.
MolecularMan14 Posted October 9, 2004 Author Posted October 9, 2004 hmm...what about isotopes like tridium? would those be affected by the anti-hydrogen?
jdurg Posted October 9, 2004 Posted October 9, 2004 hmm...what about isotopes like tridium? would those be affected by the anti-hydrogen? Why wouldn't they? Tritium, like EVERY atom in existance, is made up of the same basic particles; neutrons, protons, and electrons. (Well, protium only contains protons and electrons, but that's nitpicking. ) So anti-matter would not care what it is that it's destroying.
Gilded Posted October 9, 2004 Posted October 9, 2004 "So anti-matter would not care what it is that it's destroying." As long as it has an opposite charge, it doesn't. And that's the reason you could make disintegralicious weapons with it.
Rasori Posted October 9, 2004 Posted October 9, 2004 Erm... The controlled production of antihydrogen observed in ATHENA is a great technological and scientific event. Even more so because ATHENA has produced antihydrogen in unexpectedly abundant quantities. Where exactly do you hold these unexpectedly abundant quantities... and what do you do with them when you're done examining them?
serunato Posted October 10, 2004 Posted October 10, 2004 PET scans use the whole antimatter thing to make scans of your brain and other things. It uses an isotope of Fluorine that decays to give off a positron that is so attracted to electrons that it collides almost immediately upon creation. This gives off two photons in opposite directions, to conserve momentum. These are back traced to give a 3D type scan. Positron is a positively charged electron, in essence. And anti-proton is a negatively charged proton, essentially. But there can't be an anti-neutron, due to the fact that it has no charge. Right?
budullewraagh Posted October 10, 2004 Posted October 10, 2004 last i checked a neutron consisted of an electron and a proton, so i would imagine that a positron and negatively charged proton united as if like a neutron would be an anti-neutron
serunato Posted October 10, 2004 Posted October 10, 2004 last i checked a neutron consisted of an electron and a proton, so i would imagine that a positron and negatively charged proton united as if like a neutron would be an anti-neutron I assume that you get this from the fact that a neutron can emit an electron and thereby transmute into a proton, beta decay. But a proton can emit a positron(like the fluorine isotope) and become a neutron. Does this make a proton a neutron and a positron? That would mean it was really a proton and an electron and a positron. No, these bosons are actually made of quarks. In fact a proton is 2 up and a down while a neutron is 2 down and an up.
Gilded Posted October 10, 2004 Posted October 10, 2004 "PET scans use the whole antimatter thing to make scans of your brain and other things. It uses an isotope of Fluorine that decays to give off a positron that is so attracted to electrons that it collides almost immediately upon creation. This gives off two photons in opposite directions, to conserve momentum. These are back traced to give a 3D type scan." Yeah, my dad used to do that stuff. I think he said they used carbon-10 mostly. The isotope depends greatly on where the medicine they're testing goes, though. Carbon is used a lot since most medicines have carbon in them, which can be replaced by a carbon-10. And about the beta- and beta+, they also emit anti-neutrinos and neutrinos respectively, for those who didn't know.
swansont Posted October 10, 2004 Posted October 10, 2004 last i checked a neutron consisted of an electron and a proton Whatever you checked was wrong. A proton is made up of three quarks, uud (two "up" quarks and one "down") A neutron is udd A neutron can decay into a proton (d->u quark), but the opposite can happen as well.
swansont Posted October 10, 2004 Posted October 10, 2004 But there can't be an anti-neutron, due to the fact that it has no charge. Right? There are antineutrons. They are also neutral.
MolecularMan14 Posted October 10, 2004 Author Posted October 10, 2004 what affect would an anti-neutron, since it also has no charge
swansont Posted October 10, 2004 Posted October 10, 2004 The antineutron will have the opposite magnetic moment of the neutron.
MolecularMan14 Posted October 10, 2004 Author Posted October 10, 2004 magnetic moment? what affect would that have on the atoms' collision/reaction?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now