Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently read an interesting article in New Scientist which outlined a recent study suggesting that much of the 'missing' mass of the Universe might be found in huge clouds of ultra-cool hydrogen detected throughout scattered part of the cosmos.

Being so cool, these clouds of hydrogen are very compact, and hence have quite a high mass density. They are said to range anywhere up to the scale of the Solar System, and emit a 'steady glow' of radio-wave length energy streams.

 

However, even if this were to be found true, at least 1/3 of the postulated Universe 'mass' would still be missing...

Posted (edited)

Is the headline misleading? It makes it sound like they figured out dark matter. It says nothing about "non-baryonic" matter. They only explained missing regular (not dark) matter.

 

This is a comment below the story by Steve Nerlich.

 

"I think the deal is that this study confirms Bregman's prediction outlined here: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxi...

 

The universe recipe of 74% dark energy, 22% dark matter and 4% baryonic is unchanged. It's just that Bregman predicted that a lot of the baryonic matter would be in the form of Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium (WHIM) - or filaments. This appears to be confirmed now, so good science all round.

 

I'm not sure what the link with Zwicky is - who is not obviously cited in either the Fraser-McKelvie or Bregman papers, but might have missed something."

Edited by Airbrush

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.