emrekanca Posted May 28, 2011 Posted May 28, 2011 What is the simplest living form that have neurons. I only know worm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worm Is there simpler one?
Ringer Posted May 28, 2011 Posted May 28, 2011 Depend on what you mean by simple. Some animals like the hydra only have a kind of nerve net that serves as their nervous system. So it has neurons but doesn't have any sort of brain. 1
emrekanca Posted May 29, 2011 Author Posted May 29, 2011 (edited) Thanks, hydra is what I meant. If I want to see the neurons of hydra and model to computer , would that be possible for a regular guy? If possible what kind of microscope (capability of zoom maybe) would I need? (I would like to track the evolutionary path from simplest to complicated to see when where and how pain occurs) Worms act like they have pain when you sting copper wire on em I don't think hydra 'd. What do you think ? Edited May 29, 2011 by emrekanca
Genecks Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 (edited) Yeah, evolutionary comparisons have been studies. Plenty of people are attempting to make computational models of various species. There is a how evolutionary aspects of the nervous system to be discovered. C. elegans has few neurons. Rotifers are simple, too. evolutionary discussion of the nervous system: Science 325:24-26 (2009) exc use the typos, i'm tired. Edited July 27, 2011 by Genecks
bombus Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 What's the point of one neuron? Who would it talk to? It reminds me of the question regarding the sign at Baker Street Tube Station in London which says it was the very first tube station. Where did the trains go to?
Genecks Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 (edited) I've recently read of the possibility of amoeba learning, which would classify it as a single-celled learning lifeform. However, I'm not sure how realistic that view is. It's on my list of things to further research. http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4179 Memristive model of amoeba's learning So, with that in mind, amoebas might communicate with each other. But perhaps people are being too liberal with defining the concept of "learning." Edited July 28, 2011 by Genecks
CharonY Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 Neurons are optimized towards long-distance information transfer (via APs). Without any information to relay anywhere else they are not able to do much (as bombus implied). Chemical memory is quite a different thing, and even bacteria have it. In chemotaxis postranslational modification of a sensor system provides information on the chemical gradient the cell was facing, for instance. In short: existing chemical situations modify future biochemical reactions (or rather, their rate).
Genecks Posted August 2, 2011 Posted August 2, 2011 (edited) Maybe I'm new-age, but that still seems like learning to me. Perhaps I work off an old paradigm. Meh. Association of stimuli leads to new behavioral output, seems like a kind of conditioning/learning. Edited August 2, 2011 by Genecks
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now