Widdekind Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 Is it possible to construct 'mixed' momentum-position eigenstates, of the form: [math]\Psi \propto e^{i k x} \delta(y) \delta(z)[/math] ? Such a 'perfect pencil' of radiation would have to be perfectly monochromatic. When you put a photon into a state of monochromaticity, does its wave function "inflate" out to infinite extent, in that direction ??
swansont Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 What about that wave function is mixed? It's in terms of position. Do the Fourier transform and you get momentum. Even if you had a monochromatic photon, does that mean you know where it is?
Widdekind Posted July 6, 2011 Author Posted July 6, 2011 I must have mis-spoken. The Wave Function I offered, was a momentum eigenstate in one direction, and position eigenstates in the other two. Was that Wave Function quantum mechanically allowed ?
ajb Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 Think about the commutators of the position and the momenta.
Widdekind Posted July 13, 2011 Author Posted July 13, 2011 Don't position operators, of some spatial direction, commute, with momentum operators, of other-and-orthogonal directions ? Does that permit, or deny, the above-proposed "spaghetti-strand wave function" ?
ajb Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 [math][x^{i}, p_{j}] = i \hbar \delta^{i }_{\:\: j}[/math]. (all others are zero) So in particular [math][x, p_{y}]=0 [/math] etc. This means you can simultaneously diagonalise the operators [math]x[/math] and [math]p_{y}[/math] and thus have eigenvectors for both operators. So I think such a wave-function is ok. 1
ajb Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 We might have to be careful as such a wave-function is not square integrable (I think), we do not have a genuine Hilbert space. One needs to extend the notion to a rigged Hilbert space. That is one has to include distributions and not just square integrable functions. But this is probably more technical than you need.
Widdekind Posted July 13, 2011 Author Posted July 13, 2011 I was wondering whether, with a sufficiently slowly generated ("slowly spun off, slowly woven") photon, one could exploit Quantum non-locality to "stretch" a photon's wave packet, all the way across the cosmos, in some super-luminal way. [math]\Delta x \Delta p \approx \hbar[/math] [math]\Delta E \approx \frac{c \hbar}{\Delta x}[/math] For [math]\Delta x[/math] = 1 Gpc, [math]\Delta E \approx 10^{-32} eV[/math], an ultra-pure, nearly mono-chromatic, light source. And, that would require a generation time, of [math]\Delta t \approx \hbar / \Delta E \approx \Delta x / c[/math]. To wit, [math]\Delta x \approx c \Delta t[/math], and no "sneaky super-luminality" appears to be possible upon this particular path. What would be "weird", would be that the Wave Function would physically span the space between source & destination, being a "bridge" of photon WF. But there are probably a slew of reasons why such a suggestion is Quantum physically impractical.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now