crazynutsx Posted June 10, 2011 Posted June 10, 2011 MANY Jupiter-like exoplanets are much larger than they ought to be. Now one astronomer thinks he knows why. Since planets usually form at the same time as stars, astronomers can tell how old and therefore how hot and puffy the gas giants should be. But many of the recently discovered gaseous exoplanets are larger than expected. Eduardo Martin of the Institute of Astrophysics of the Canary Islands believes this is because the puffy planets formed from the gas and dust ejected when two binary stars merged. This would make the planets much younger than their hosts, which would explain their unusual heat and puffiness. He presented his findings at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Boston last week. "The process is possible, but it's unlikely to explain the multitude of inflated planets that we're now discovering," says Adam Burrows of Princeton University, who was not involved in the research. Martin agrees that there are too few binary systems to account for the number of puffy planets seen. But he thinks that's because the number of binaries has been underestimated, so he is now searching for the "missing" population -1
swansont Posted June 10, 2011 Posted June 10, 2011 ! Moderator Note Plagiarism is a big no-no, as is copyright violation.
baric Posted June 13, 2011 Posted June 13, 2011 Martin agrees that there are too few binary systems to account for the number of puffy planets seen. But he thinks that's because the number of binaries has been underestimated, so he is now searching for the "missing" population I'm not sure I follow this logic. It would seem to me that a secondary star in a binary system would be much easier to detect than a puffy planet. It follows, then, that if binary systems are the sole cause of puffy planets that we should always find them in a known binary system.
Ophiolite Posted June 14, 2011 Posted June 14, 2011 (edited) The significant words in the post are "when two binary stars merged". There is now only a single star. That would be an interesting event to watch.......from a suitable distance. You can read the full paper here. Edited for typo Edited June 14, 2011 by Ophiolite 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now