Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The following is this writer's understanding, of the mechanism, by which a core-collapsing hyper-massive star generates, firstly, a central stellar-massed BH ('polar pancake phase'); and, secondly, a short-lived Accretion Disk, around that BH, whose 'consumption' powers the GRB jets, parallel to the rotation axis ('equatorial consumption phase'). Is such the conventional explanation ?

 

grbjetgenesis.th.jpg

 

_52994752_gammarayburst.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

According to figure 10, from a redshift of z ~ 1, that which is observed to span 4 days, "here-and-now" at earth, actually occurred over only 2 days, "there-and-then", at the source, in the source-frame. Whilst Prof. Perlmutter is referring, in said cited source, to SNIa, surely the same "stretch factor" affects GRBs, as well. Perhaps this has some impact, on the "short-burst" vs. "long-burst" debate ?? All else being equal, more cosmologically distant GRB Hyper-Novae (HN) will appear to have longer, more slowly evolving, light-curves... could those durations be used, to estimate, the red-shift, of the source-emitter HN ???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.