36grit Posted August 4, 2011 Posted August 4, 2011 Perhaps gravitational force is a fluctuating force. Drawing energy in for fuel, and then pushing it out as waste. That is to say that: electrical vacuum energy is siphoned in, then converted to pure outward momentum via proton vibration. Kind of like a two cycle engine.
MigL Posted August 10, 2011 Posted August 10, 2011 In Newton's interpretation of gravity the force is dependant only on separation and mass. Einstein re-defined gravity as a curvature of space/time dependant on mass, energy and pressure. Now mass is easy to understand, and so is energy because it can be shown to be equivalent to mass, but actually increasing the temperature of a solid by about 10 degrees increases its mass by a miniscule amount ( don't want to do the calculation but probably about a trillionth of a gram ) and so the gravitational 'force' it exerts. Similarily pressure, a potential energy, increases the energy content of a mass, making it more 'massive' and generating a greater gravitatinal force. In effect compressing a spring, increases its mass and the gravitational force it exerts. Negative pressure would, by analogy, decreases potential energy, mass, and therefore gravitational force. I believe it was Alan Guth, when he came up with inflation, who postulated the energy of the universe to have hung at a false vacuum state. Picture a U shaped curve with a bump in the middle, or a sombrero shape or the mold for a bundt cake. If the energy is hung on the central bump of the curve, the hat part of the sombrero if you will, before rolling down into the brim part, it can be shown using GR that this is negative pressure condition. If this negative pressure is large enough it will overcome the gravitational attraction of the universe and lead to inflation. This is the Higgs mechanism since it involves a spontaneous break in symmetry ( the top of the hat is perectly symmetric, but once it rolls down into the brim, symmetry is lost ), and the Higgs particle in this case is called an inflaton to distinguish it from the electroweak Higgs particle or the GUT particle. Guth ( I believe, as its been a while since I read his stuff ) estimated that in the time it took for energy to roll down into the 'rim', about 10^-35 sec. the size of the universe increased by 10^30 to 10^100 in size ( depending on certain conditions ). This could still be happening on a much smaller scale, to account for the 'new cosmological constant', or the increase in expansion rate of the universe. Witten, I believe, has speculated on a vacuum fluctuation in a space ( say right beside you) which 'borrows' energy for a short period of time and on the way to re-paying the loan, gets hung up of this false vauum energy level, leading to new universes being created wherever the negative pressure is sufficient to overcome gravity. These new universes are causally disconnected because of the large expansion rate, and its called chaotic inflationary theory. I don't see a connection to syphoning waste, proton vibration or two cycle engines.
36grit Posted August 12, 2011 Author Posted August 12, 2011 So, the gravity of the universe existed before the universe? And some kind of energy that overcame this gravity? I watched some you tube videos on the theory. I not going to pretend to understand what they, or you are trying to say, but It is nice background for imaging. we're asuming that energy existed before the universe. And that there were energy barriers existing outside of time, or that time existed before the universe. The more I understand the theory the more I like mine, which doesn't seem to me, to be all that different from my latest "expansion plane" theory. Before the universe there were only unitarian planes of energy and no particles. As fields passed through each other the faster plane would particlize the slower plane in manner of relevancy. This action leads to distance where change and momentum are possible. Change in one dimesion is heat, change in two dimesions is gravity, change in three dimesions is time. I've become quite adapt at visualizing things existing outside of time and space, where size has no relevance. The speed of light is the great divider of what is wave and what is particle. The universe is an expansion of complex enegies. The atom is the particle of this expansion field. The atom is not a perpetual motion machine. It is however (according to my theory) responsible for building the third dimension. It is creating a three dimensional, gravitational hologram via the velocity time dialation spike, that occurs when the proton moves against it's own momentum at near the speed of light. The proton is vibrated by vacuum energy anihilations within it's core. The rings of the two dimensional atom carry a negative charge that is attracted to the positive charge within the time dialation spike. When they touch the anihilation of this momentum of energy is amplified into the energy capable cables and rings of the three dimensional universe. The vacuum energy has to come from somewhere. Ofcourse it's following the path of least resistance. There are non-energy propagating rings of "distance" that certainly seem like the likely place. electrons quantum leap over this distance as if it were not even there. If we could figure out the exact mechanism, we'd be on our way to quantum leaping to the stars because the energy and the mechanism is right there.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now