Why dark matter does not emit photon? My answer!

[icarus2]

Hello

I’m sorry. I can’t English well. My native language is not English....

 

We are now living in the era of new revolution.

Are we again treading on the process of huge revolution that occurred in the late 19th century and the early 20th century?

 

The current observation of dark matter requires explanation on two important situations as the following.

 

Situation 1: Denial of the gravitational (attractive) phenomenon

Dark matter is five times more than the general matter, but it does not show macro-structure like the structure of galaxy or galaxy cluster, or micro-structure like fixed star or planet. The result of the current observation is that dark matter has attractive interaction with the general matter, but does not interact with the other dark matter. In other words, the observation or interpretation is that dark matters do not exert gravity(attraction) on each other.

 

Situation 2: Denial of the fundamental phenomenon of physics that absorbs or emits photons

It is not the level that dark matter has not interacts electromagnetically because it is electrically neutral, but the observation result is the level that dark matter does not emits or absorbs photons.

 

From the several explanations above(refer to my old thread or my paper), Situation 1 shows that the essence of dark matter is negative mass, and that consequently they have the repulsive gravitational effect, so it can be explained.

 

In regard to Situation 2, without giving that kind of characteristics of “the observation result that seems to be that it does not emit or absorb photons” from the first, can this kind of result be induced from other basic principle?

 

 

A. Negative mass is stable at the state of high energy.

 

 

Fig1. [math]\vec F = - m_ - \vec a[/math],

[math]\vec a = - \frac{{\vec F}}{{m_ - }}[/math],([math]m_ - > 0[/math]). The acceleration of negative mass is opposite of the direction of force, and in case of negative mass, it does harmonic oscillation at the maximum point and is stable at the maximum point.

 

B. The problem of transition from positive energy level to negative energy level

Since we do not know clearly about the characteristics of negative mass yet, we do not know whether transition of positive mass at the positive energy level to negative energy level is possible or not.

 

 

Fig2. Transition to the negative energy level

 

However, for positive mass to enter the area of negative energy level, energy should have the negative value, and this means that it should have the characteristics of the negative mass.

When considering the process of entering the domain of negative energy level from positive energy level, it must pass through the domain between 0 and [math]- \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega[/math]. In case it follows the laws of negative mass because it's in the domain of negative energy, it cannot reach [math]- \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega[/math],which is the first energy level of negative, because it is stable at the state of high energy, and it tries to have higher value of energy. It is because the energy level [math]0^ -[/math] is much higher than the energy level [math]- \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega[/math]. That is to say that it shows possibility that the law of negative mass itself does not allow the situation where positive mass at the positive energy level succeed to the negative energy level.

 

Even if it reaches [math]- \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega[/math], the first energy level, at the negative energy level, it must follow the law of negative mass, it is stable at the state of high energy, and thus “the problem of the transition of the energy level of minus infinity” does not occur.

 

As we have examined above, “the problem of the transition of the energy level of minus infinity” does not occur, and thus positive mass and negative mass can exist in the same spacetime. This is a very important result because it means that negative mass and negative energy can exist stably in our universe.

 

(This finding suggests that “the problem of the transition of the energy level of minus infinity”, which we have had for eighty years regardless of whether negative mass exists or not, does not occur, and it itself has important meaning. Thus, it needs to be reflected in the teachings that are being performed when explaining the solution to negative energy, which the relativistic energy eq. suggests.)

 

 

In regard to Situation 2, without giving that kind of characteristics of “the observation result that seems to be that it does not emit or absorb photons” from the first, can this kind of result be induced from other basic principle?

 

Now, to think about this problem,

 

C. Why dark matter does not emit photon?

1) The process of negative mass emitting photon

[math]- E_ - - h\nu < - E_ -[/math]

[math]- E_ -[/math]: Initial energy of negative mass, [math](E_ - > 0)[/math]

[math]h\nu[/math]: Energy of photon

 

The relational expression above means that if negative mass emits photon(with positive energy), then the energy after emitting gets lower than the energy before emitting.

 

Negative mass is stable at the state of high energy, so the voluntary transition that negative mass emits photon and succeeds to the lower energy level does not exist. Therefore, negative mass explains the result of the current observation that dark matter does not emit photon from the fundamental principle.

 

* The explanation on why dark matter does not emit photon is enough with this. In my paper, more various situations are set-up.

 

---Icarus2

 

Negative Mass is Stable at the State of High Energy

http://vixra.org/abs/1107.0052

=================================================================

 

Situation 1: Denial of the gravitational (attractive) phenomenon

 

1. Dark matter is five times more than the general matter, but it does not show macro-structure like the structure of galaxy or galaxy cluster, or micro-structure like fixed star or planet.

 

2. Dark matter does not attractive interact with the other dark matter.

Ex. Bullet Cluster

 

From the several explanations above(refer to my old thread or my paper), Above situation shows that the essence of dark matter is negative mass, and that consequently they have the repulsive gravitational effect, so it can be explained.

 

============

The law of motion of negative mass and positive mass

-----------

-[math]m_1 [/math]........... +[math]m_2 [/math]

 

fig02. Negative mass -[math]m_1 [/math] and positive mass +[math]m_2 [/math] (initial velocity =0, [math]m_1>0[/math], [math]m_2>0[/math])

[math] -m_1 \vec a_1 = - G\frac{{( - m_1 )m_2 }}{{r^2 }}\hat r[/math]

[math] \vec a_1 = - G\frac{{m_2 }}{{r^2 }}\hat r[/math]

[math] +m_2 \vec a_2 = - G\frac{{( - m_1 )m_2 }}{{r^2 }}\hat r[/math]

[math] \vec a_2 = G\frac{{m_1 }}{{r^2 }}\hat r[/math]

 

Negative mass and positive mass : Negative mass is accelerated in the direction of positive mass, and positive mass is accelerated in the direction to be far away from negative mass. The direction of acceleration a1 worked on negative mass [math]–m_1[/math] is [math]-\hat r[/math], so [math]-m_1[/math] moves in the direction of reducing distance r, and the direction of acceleration a2 worked on positive mass [math]+m_2[/math] is [math]+\hat r[/math], so positive mass [math]+m_2[/math] is accelerated in the direction that distance r increases, namely the direction of being far away from negative mass

 

If the absolute value of positive mass is bigger than that of negative mass, they will meet within finite time(attractive effect), and if the absolute value of positive mass is smaller than that of negative mass, the distance between them will be bigger, and they cannot meet(repulsive effect). The type of force is repulsion, so the potential energy has positive value.

 

Let's take a look at the case where the absolute value of the positive mass is very bigger than the absolute value of the negative mass.

[math] [m_2 > > | - m_1 |][/math]

[math] \vec a_1 = - G\frac{{m_2 }}{{r^2 }}\hat r[/math]

[math] \vec a_2 = G\frac{{m_1 }}{{r^2 }}\hat r \approx 0 [/math]

 

The acceleration of the negative mass [math] - m_1 [/math] is [math]\vec a_1 = - G\frac{{m_2 }}{{r^2 }}\hat r[/math]

. Yet, this is the same as the acceleration of the positive mass that has small size around a massive positive mass.

 

In other words, if there is the minimalist negative mass on the surface of the earth, this means that it falls in the direction of the center of the earth like the positive mass. The motion of negative mass around the massive positive mass is very similar to that of the positive mass around the massive positive mass.

 

If there is negative mass around a massive positive mass, then the negative mass gets affected by the attractive effect, and consequently, it becomes clustered around the massive positive mass.

 

This characteristic seems to be related to the highly strange natures that the dark matter currently has. For more detailed information, refer to Chapter III-C.

 

Refer to above video : time 2:00 ~ 7:02

=============

 

3. Dark matter that is almost uniformly distributed

By the repulsive effect among dark matter (negative mass), dark matter is distributed uniformly.

 

4. The problem of nonobservance of galaxy or cluster of galaxies consisted of dark matter

The repulsive gravity (antigravity) effect among dark matter makes difficult for galaxy or clusters of galaxies, which are only consisted of dark matter, to form massive mass structure.

 

5. Low interaction among dark matter

The repulsive gravity effect among dark matter is the cause.

 

6. The problem of nonobservance of dark matter

1) The fact that dark matter is unobserved earth or solar systems.

2) Dark matter does not exist in the center of galaxy.

The result of observation that the black hole in the center of galaxy does not absorb dark matter and it will not absorb.

3) Dark matter does not exist in Galactic plane.

4) Dark matter does not exist in halo inside the galaxy.

Dark matter made of negative mass is usually distributed outside the galaxy, so it can explain the nonobservance of it inside the galaxy.

 

 

7. Dark matter becomes clustered around galaxy.

According to “The motions of negative mass and positive mass,” that we have examined above, when the absolute value of positive mass is bigger than that of negative mass, there exists the attractive effect between positive mass and negative mass, so the negative mass becomes clustered around the massive positive mass.

 

Currently, negative mass is distributed usually around outside the galaxy, the clustering phenomenon (or Gravitational Lens effect) of negative mass (dark matter) occurs in galaxy or at the level of cluster of galaxies.

 

The explanations above provide explanations about very strange characteristics related to those of dark matter. Dark matter that is consisted of negative mass usually spreads outside the galaxy, so it is observed that it becomes clustered around galaxy or clusters of galaxies that are consisted of positive mass. On the other hand, since it barely exists inside the galaxy, it doesn’t show becoming clustered around Earth, or any objects in the solar system and galaxy, and yet, we can know that it still generates the effect of additional centripetal force on objects within the galaxy.

 

Negative Mass is Stable at the State of High Energy

http://vixra.org/abs/1107.0052

Edited August 6, 2011 by icarus2

[Janus]

 

 

Situation 1: Denial of the gravitational (attractive) phenomenon

Dark matter is five times more than the general matter, but it does not show macro-structure like the structure of galaxy or galaxy cluster, or micro-structure like fixed star or planet. The result of the current observation is that dark matter has attractive interaction with the general matter, but does not interact with the other dark matter. In other words, the observation or interpretation is that dark matters do not exert gravity(attraction) on each other.

 

 

 

Wrong. For one, DM does form macro-structures, in the from of galactic halos and around galaxy clusters. Secondly, it does interact with itself gravitationally. The reason that it does not form smaller structures is due to the very fact that it does not interact electromagnetically and thus cannot not avail itself of that mechanism to shed energy.

 

When baryonic particles make a near approach to each other, their electromagnetic fields interact causing a deflection of the particles. This deflection results in the particles also emitting electromagnetic radiation, which comes at the expense of the kinetic energy of the particles and they leave each other with less speed then they met. If the the new velocity is low enough the two particles may become gravitationally bound. If the approach is close enough or the relative velocity small enough, the particles "stick" together electromagnetically and start to shed their energy as electromagnetic radiation. Constant interactions of this type lead to compact bodies such as planets (part of the internal heat of out own planet is due to it still shedding the energy of its formation)

 

When DM particles make a close approach, they only interact gravitationally, this can still cause a deflection, but this deflection doe not result in the release of EMR, and subsequent loss of energy/velocity. There will be a emission of gravitational radiation, but since this is ~10³⁹ times weaker than electromagnetic radiation, its effect is very small. For the most part, DM particles will just approach each other pass, and then leave at the same speed at which they approached.

 

They shed some energy via gravitational radiation, and gravitational interaction between a group of particles can lead to some losing velocity others gain it, leaving the slower particles in a loose gravitationally bound group. It these types of interaction that lead to the macroscopic structures that DM does form. But such weak interactions take a long time to achieve any type of noticeable result, which is why DM has so far only formed the type of loose structures we see.

[icarus2]

Wrong. For one, DM does form macro-structures, in the from of galactic halos and around galaxy clusters. Secondly, it does interact with itself gravitationally.

 

Refer to below link!

 

Birth of the Universe from the Zero Energy state - Bigbang Simulation :

 

Centripetal force effect in the galaxy from dark matter(negative mass) halo out of the galaxy :

Edited August 9, 2011 by icarus2