finiter Posted August 12, 2011 Posted August 12, 2011 It is proposed that forces are created as a reaction to the energy possessed. Kinetic energy creates gravitational force, potential energy creates electrostatic force, and the motion of particles having potential energy creates magnetic force. These three are the only real forces of nature, ie, the only forces that have fields. The strong nuclear force is the gravitational force at the level of electrons/positrons. The weak nuclear force is a pseudo force – the energy possessed acts against integration of matter, and so is a pseudo force. The motion of the fundamental particle creates an attractive force equivalent to mc2/2. When these particles integrate, this force gets transferred to higher levels. No additional force is created subsequently. In electrons and positrons, half of the natural energy exists as potential energy or charge, and half as kinetic. Therefore, half of the force manifests as gravity and the rest, as electrostatic force. Both are equivalent to mc2/4. Magnetic force is created at the expense of electrostatic force. As all the large-scale structures are formed by the integration of electron-positron pairs, the gravitational and electromagnetic forces ares eparately conserved. As both the forces are equal in the case of electron/positron, we get the relation, Gm2 = Ee2, where G and E are the respective constants, and 'm' the average mass. From this, the G of electron/positron can be calculated. This works out to be 2.7782x1032m3/kgs2. The three basic forces can be calculated using this G (in the case of magneticforce, the constant is G/c2). The G of atoms, the G of masses (of atoms), and the G of the universe can be arrived at from this G. We have to use mass to calculate all the three forces. At present, we are using charge, a relative value for the mass of electron, for calculating electrostatic force, and the difference is adjusted in the constant. However, in the case of protons, using charge for calculating electrostatic force will lead to wrong conclusions. The relatively small size attributed to a proton may be such a wrong conclusion.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now