Luciano Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 Hi everyone! Considering that many GWAS studies have failed to find susceptibility genes with high penetrance, therefore not explaining most of the heritability of many diseases, which approach could be more sensitive for capturing signals of susceptibility variants to complex diseases, in your opinion: sequence exome of many unrelated affected individuals and compare to controls or sequence affected and normal individuals from familial cases and combine the results with linkage analysis... Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 The problem with these high-dimensional approaches is that false positive discoveries go up with the number of hypotheses (here: loci) being tested. I have the feeling that without more biological information most of these non-hypothesis driven approaches are shots in the dark. Throughput alone will not give the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now