little boy Posted September 14, 2011 Posted September 14, 2011 Is NH3 a Arrhenius base? I don't know whether a Arrhenius base requires a OH- in the molecule.
hypervalent_iodine Posted September 14, 2011 Posted September 14, 2011 Kind of but not really, it depends how you look at the reaction. Read this link, it gives a good explanation of the limitations using your example. Truth be told, the Arrhenius definition is inherently limited in its application. Generally we consider amines as acting as either a Lewis base, since amines can donate a lone pair of electrons, or as a Bronsted-Lowry base (which is more or less the same as the Arrhenius definition, but not as limited), as they can accept H+.
little boy Posted September 14, 2011 Author Posted September 14, 2011 Kind of but not really, it depends how you look at the reaction. Read this link, it gives a good explanation of the limitations using your example. Truth be told, the Arrhenius definition is inherently limited in its application. Generally we consider amines as acting as either a Lewis base, since amines can donate a lone pair of electrons, or as a Bronsted-Lowry base (which is more or less the same as the Arrhenius definition, but not as limited), as they can accept H+. The page states : "Nevertheless, there are hydroxide ions there, and we can squeeze this into the Arrhenius theory." so I think it is Arrhenius base
mississippichem Posted September 14, 2011 Posted September 14, 2011 I wouldn't worry too much. The Bronstead and Lewis definitions are much more broad and useful anyway. The Arrenhius definition is by far the most narrow of the commonly used acid/base theories.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now