Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Kind of but not really, it depends how you look at the reaction. Read this link, it gives a good explanation of the limitations using your example.

 

Truth be told, the Arrhenius definition is inherently limited in its application. Generally we consider amines as acting as either a Lewis base, since amines can donate a lone pair of electrons, or as a Bronsted-Lowry base (which is more or less the same as the Arrhenius definition, but not as limited), as they can accept H+.

Posted

Kind of but not really, it depends how you look at the reaction. Read this link, it gives a good explanation of the limitations using your example.

 

Truth be told, the Arrhenius definition is inherently limited in its application. Generally we consider amines as acting as either a Lewis base, since amines can donate a lone pair of electrons, or as a Bronsted-Lowry base (which is more or less the same as the Arrhenius definition, but not as limited), as they can accept H+.

 

The page states :

nh3h2oeqn.gif

 

"Nevertheless, there are hydroxide ions there, and we can squeeze this into the Arrhenius theory."

so I think it is Arrhenius base

Posted

I wouldn't worry too much. The Bronstead and Lewis definitions are much more broad and useful anyway. The Arrenhius definition is by far the most narrow of the commonly used acid/base theories.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.