The Light Barrier Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 Ok, well here it is, let me hear what you all think... Speed of light 0.00009252853642*299.792458= 0.02773935736849 log (0.02773935736849)= -1.55690360434967 1/10e-1 = 1 1/1 = 1 Frequencywave = 299.792458/1 = 299.792458
Bignose Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 I too can just multiply random numbers together. 4*5 = 20. yay! I don't think that I've proved any more or less than you have. Perhaps you should actually tell us what your equations mean, and why you think that they prove anything about infinity? And include units on the equations, too.
The Light Barrier Posted September 19, 2011 Author Posted September 19, 2011 (edited) ARE YOU SURE? 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510 / 1313122.5390852564 = 0.00000239245962 log(0.00000239245962) = -5.6211553835236 1 / 10e5 = 0.000001 1 / 0.000001 = 1000000 1 / 1000000 = 0.000001 0.000001*12 = 0.000012 0.000012^2 = 1.44e-10 My equations means that the speed of light is = E = t --->Energy = Time simple stuff, no need to be speculative here, I am only trying to help you all "learn" something new, already in about less then 24 hours I am being treated so un-welcomed by many. This does not really inspire me to continue in this forum and maybe I should go somewhere else. However, if you can do this too THEN LETS SEE! I too can just multiply random numbers together. 4*5 = 20. yay! I don't think that I've proved any more or less than you have. Perhaps you should actually tell us what your equations mean, and why you think that they prove anything about infinity? And include units on the equations, too. Edited September 19, 2011 by The Light Barrier
questionposter Posted September 20, 2011 Posted September 20, 2011 (edited) ARE YOU SURE? 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510 / 1313122.5390852564 = 0.00000239245962 log(0.00000239245962) = -5.6211553835236 1 / 10e5 = 0.000001 1 / 0.000001 = 1000000 1 / 1000000 = 0.000001 0.000001*12 = 0.000012 0.000012^2 = 1.44e-10 My equations means that the speed of light is = E = t --->Energy = Time simple stuff, no need to be speculative here, I am only trying to help you all "learn" something new, already in about less then 24 hours I am being treated so un-welcomed by many. This does not really inspire me to continue in this forum and maybe I should go somewhere else. However, if you can do this too THEN LETS SEE! I haven't really seen any harassment though, and also infinity isn't a number or even a variable, it's a term for the existence that is instantaneous a never ending counting of numbers so I don't see how it could equal 1 except if you do things like divide infinity by infinity but and even then it depends on the context. Otherwise what it seems your trying to show is some kind of number theory or properties of numbers themselves and then determining logically what that means in reality related to light. Edited September 20, 2011 by questionposter
The Light Barrier Posted September 20, 2011 Author Posted September 20, 2011 (edited) yes in a sense you seem to understand, it is that n = a fraction thing , this is also used in the rules of mathematical Mathematical induction of :1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + n = ½n(n + 1)...here we really see that 1/2 = 0.5 which loops onto 1 again. I think it is this where my calculations are headed in. I haven't really seen any harassment though, and also infinity isn't a number or even a variable, it's a term for the existence that is instantaneous a never ending counting of numbers so I don't see how it could equal 1 except if you divide infinity by infinity, and even then it depends on the context. Otherwise what it seems your trying to show is some kind of number theory or properties of numbers themselves and then determining logically what that means in reality related to light. Edited September 20, 2011 by The Light Barrier
questionposter Posted September 20, 2011 Posted September 20, 2011 (edited) yes in a sense you seem to understand, it is that n = a fraction thing , this is also used in the rules of mathematical Mathematical induction of :1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + n = ½n(n + 1)...here we really see that 1/2 = 0.5 which loops onto 1 again. I think it is this where my calculations are headed in. Oh wait, NOW I see what your saying, your talking about that triangle where 2*4=8 8/2=4 8/4=2 But, I don't see how that works with infinity because infinity isn't a single number and there aren't some single things that you can multiply and divide to get infinity other than infinity. The only way you can do that is with infinity itself, so maybe like ∞/∞ can equal 1 in some cases, but lets look at that. 2*∞=∞ ∞/2=∞ 2/∞= forgot how that works, but probably ∞. Actually I think it's currently undefined or that we have no idea. If two numbers multiply to make a product, then the product can be decided by 1 factor to make the other factor, but there's no way you can make two when you do 2*∞, and that's mostly because infinity isn't an actual number. Edited September 20, 2011 by questionposter
MathWizard93 Posted September 20, 2011 Posted September 20, 2011 (edited) I've always thought 0 was infinity. It's nothing so it encompasses everything, it's space and the walls of space expanding, it's infinite, 1 is solid. We're all inside the big space of infinite 0, space. Edited September 20, 2011 by MathWizard93
questionposter Posted September 20, 2011 Posted September 20, 2011 (edited) 0 doesn't count never ending-ly. Perhaps there is some process where things with 0 can yield the result of infinity like maybe in 1/0, but otherwise 0 by itself is just nothing, not infinity. It's kind of weird how you can multiply by it or use it like that at all and mathematicians look at it as just any old number, because 2*0=0 0/2=0 2/0=? Whereas in normal numbers 2*4=8 8/2=4 8/4=2 It's the same problem with infinity. When do you ever multiply something by nothingness in nature even? Edited September 20, 2011 by questionposter
Phi for All Posted September 20, 2011 Posted September 20, 2011 already in about less then 24 hours I am being treated so un-welcomed by many. This does not really inspire me to continue in this forum and maybe I should go somewhere else. ! Moderator Note One person used a personal attack and was warned against repeating that rule violation. You used the report system correctly and it worked. Please refrain from talking about persecution and further derailing the thread.
Bignose Posted September 20, 2011 Posted September 20, 2011 (edited) However, if you can do this too THEN LETS SEE! challenge accepted. 2.71828182845904523536028747135 * 3.14159265358979323846264338328 = 8.5397342226735670654635508695465744950348885357651 erf(8.5397342226735670654635508695465744950348885357651) = 1.3971161324848120486438955428453916924159213372001*10^-33 1 / 10e32 = 100000000000000000000000000000000 1 / 100000000000000000000000000000000 = 0.000000000000000000000000000000001 0.000000000000000000000000000000001 * 11 = 0.000000000000000000000000000000011 0.000000000000000000000000000000011^2 = 1.21 e-64 Ummm, yay? Again, seemingly randomly doing mathematical operations on some numbers...... Perhaps you'd like to actually EXPLAIN what your numbers are supposed to mean? With units? Otherwise, this is nothing more that someone with access to a decent calculator can 'discover' just by putting numbers in. Without any meaning attached to the numbers, they are just ... numbers. I am willing to read it and be open minded about it, but so far, I don't see anything that really has any meaning, nor any reason to think that infinity = 1. It may be obvious to you, but the rest of us need some help. yes in a sense you seem to understand, it is that n = a fraction thing , this is also used in the rules of mathematical Mathematical induction of :1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + n = ½n(n + 1)...here we really see that 1/2 = 0.5 which loops onto 1 again. I think it is this where my calculations are headed in. What does this even mean? How exactly does 1/2 'loop' into 1? Please define your terms, clearly, explicitly, and in terms well-defined or accepted by mathematics, please. Edited September 20, 2011 by Bignose
The Light Barrier Posted September 21, 2011 Author Posted September 21, 2011 (edited) Ok before I explain the 0.5 thing I just wanted to show you something about the random numbers you chose for your find of: 1.21e-64 Here is my dissection of it which relates to e of 2.718: 1.21e-64 / 8.85185438153131e+134 = 1.36694521604938e-199 log(1.36694521604938e-199) = -198.8642488905852 1/10e198 = 10e-200<----------- you notice that? this is the famed n = 0.5 and in this we see where the "loop" in time takes place. This is in the bases of ten! But it is more complex than that. Look here at another find of mine and please "look" at what is going on as apposed to just choosing random numbers here...OK? 8.1802469e-39/8.18024691358027e-39= 0.99999999833987 = Natural anti algorithm = 2.71828182394633 2.7182818284590452353602874713527 My mathematics in this has also calculated the Natural anti algorithm of e to the 9th integer of its natural sequential number 2.71828182 I am not using random numbers here, as this would have taken years to find in the 20 minutes I used to find it just now. My math is a very highly and advanced mathematics of my own invention. They are translation much like the Lorenz Transformations, but I use an infinite demension as a variable as apposed to 3 dimensions of cartesian vectors of x y z. I will explain your request, but really wish I had more time in doing so. Time is a circle which completes something as in x distance or frequency wave. Now, if you think "out of the box" you will ask yourself, where "in" this circle of 360 degrees is the starting point and the ending point logically or where is the origin? But, I still need help in this, as I believe my math proves everything is "truly" and really = 1. I really had issues with these finds and so many others until I was convinced of this and went public. Now a simple explanation as my time is limited at the moment, but I shall respond with more technical explanations later. The answer is in Earths axil tilt. This is so because precession of the equinoxes and time on earth takes place at this location. Now when you notice a right triangle such as in trigonometry, you see that the slope or secant of this "of coarse" is always at an angle.Some never question why this is, they only care for their answer right? However, it is this slope that is in relation to earth's axial tilt and one of my most studied areas. Everybody knows that it is the year 2012 in Australia as opposed to 2011 in or current "Northern American Region" and that Jesus Christ was born twice. This is so because of the Christmas holiday Celebrated twice a year. One in the Northern region and one in the Southern Region. Proof: http://goaustralia.a...a/a/ausjune.htm Looking at how 1 / 2 = 0.5 is an attempt to rectify this obscured way of 1. Thus all known mathematics on earth is inversed which explains why algebra functions much in this same fashion. When working with ratios which are infact fractions of x, we can see how this 1 / 2 = 0.5 belief can be misleading as n = 1. And when not fully comprehended while using e scales of ten, one confuses that this e scale is truly in relation to a 300 degree compleation of time verses a 360 degree """"cycled loop!""" As per the speed of light and the changes in seasons, it all holds in a 2x relation with pi ratio, the speed of light and energy. As earlier mentioned, I shall prepare a better explanation on a later time as my time here is quite limited. Thanks! hope this helps for now! challenge accepted. 2.71828182845904523536028747135 * 3.14159265358979323846264338328 = 8.5397342226735670654635508695465744950348885357651 erf(8.5397342226735670654635508695465744950348885357651) = 1.3971161324848120486438955428453916924159213372001*10^-33 1 / 10e32 = 100000000000000000000000000000000 1 / 100000000000000000000000000000000 = 0.000000000000000000000000000000001 0.000000000000000000000000000000001 * 11 = 0.000000000000000000000000000000011 0.000000000000000000000000000000011^2 = 1.21 e-64 Ummm, yay? Again, seemingly randomly doing mathematical operations on some numbers...... Perhaps you'd like to actually EXPLAIN what your numbers are supposed to mean? With units? Otherwise, this is nothing more that someone with access to a decent calculator can 'discover' just by putting numbers in. Without any meaning attached to the numbers, they are just ... numbers. I am willing to read it and be open minded about it, but so far, I don't see anything that really has any meaning, nor any reason to think that infinity = 1. It may be obvious to you, but the rest of us need some help. What does this even mean? How exactly does 1/2 'loop' into 1? Please define your terms, clearly, explicitly, and in terms well-defined or accepted by mathematics, please. I think what you said was great! It helped me on something look, I followed your order of 2*∞=∞, except I switched them: 1 / 2*3.14 / 0.5 = 3.14 1 / 3.14 = 0.31847133757962 1 / 0.31847133757962 = 3.13999999999998 round off = 3.14 WOW! THIS WAS GOOD! It seems that the only value that infinity has "must be pi." And frequency of coarse must be: 299.792458/ 3.13999999999998/0.5 = 190.95061019108402 4 / 190.95061019108402 = 0.02094782517844 log[10](0.02094782517844) = -1.67886105919081 1 / 10e1 = 0.01 0.01 / 3.13999999999998 = 0.0031847133758 log(0.0031847133758) = -2.49692964807269 1 / 10e2 = 0.001 Notice how the highlighted dark exponents in relation to 10 are forming the natural numbers in sequences of 1 2 3 4... Seems like the number 4 is a divine number. Also looks like the bases of ten = 0 empty space rather known as infinity which has no more numbers! These must be the h constant then! Now it make sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is where infinite space switches in a "nullified zone" in relation to e scales and quantum physics! And this is in relation to pi ratio which thus loops this in relation to time and the speed of light hidden in the form of 0.5. Rather yet known as fractions of time in descret values of energy = h. Oh wait, NOW I see what your saying, your talking about that triangle where 2*4=8 8/2=4 8/4=2 But, I don't see how that works with infinity because infinity isn't a single number and there aren't some single things that you can multiply and divide to get infinity other than infinity. The only way you can do that is with infinity itself, so maybe like ∞/∞ can equal 1 in some cases, but lets look at that. 2*∞=∞ ∞/2=∞ 2/∞= forgot how that works, but probably ∞. Actually I think it's currently undefined or that we have no idea. If two numbers multiply to make a product, then the product can be decided by 1 factor to make the other factor, but there's no way you can make two when you do 2*∞, and that's mostly because infinity isn't an actual number. Edited September 21, 2011 by The Light Barrier
Pincho Paxton Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 You don't seem to be working on any negative numbers at all. If you have infinity as 1, the negative version is -1, and the total is zero.
Bignose Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 (edited) 1/10e198 = 10e-200<----------- you notice that? I noticed the math mistake here... is that what you wanted me to notice? I will explain your request, but really wish I had more time in doing so. Please take all the time you need. Because I need a very detailed explanation. I need to know why each and every number you've picked has meaning and where it comes from. Because I literally just typed some random numbers out. Hey, while you are taking your time to answer that, go ahead and ponder this too: I am typing this on one computer. Not an infinite number of computers. Clearly 1 does not equal infinity. Edited September 21, 2011 by Bignose
questionposter Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) I noticed the math mistake here... is that what you wanted me to notice? Please take all the time you need. Because I need a very detailed explanation. I need to know why each and every number you've picked has meaning and where it comes from. Because I literally just typed some random numbers out. Hey, while you are taking your time to answer that, go ahead and ponder this too: I am typing this on one computer. Not an infinite number of computers. Clearly 1 does not equal infinity. Now that I look at it, I think he just googled some kind of complex number thing but he doesn't know how it works. Literally, he might just be trying to make him/herself look smart. Edited September 22, 2011 by questionposter
The Light Barrier Posted September 26, 2011 Author Posted September 26, 2011 (edited) yes! this is exactly what I wanted you to notice, it is this error. And in this we get the famous round off errors in computers. This is why my findings are looked at as pulling numbers out of no where where in fact I am manipulating them to satisfy the logic behind infinity and the loops of 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. Any and every log style always is used again and again within a base ten numeral matrix. It is like a constant we use somehow. The ponder to your question of: I am typing this on one computer. Not an infinite number of computers. Clearly 1 does not equal infinity. This is how I look at this, although you are typing on 1 computer, many people will assume to read what you are typing in this forum. So technically, what you are typing may converge to infinty depending on how many people are reading your 1 typed message...And hence in vertual paralleled times zones all over earth converged to a 0 = 24 on line service server. I noticed the math mistake here... is that what you wanted me to notice? Please take all the time you need. Because I need a very detailed explanation. I need to know why each and every number you've picked has meaning and where it comes from. Because I literally just typed some random numbers out. Hey, while you are taking your time to answer that, go ahead and ponder this too: I am typing this on one computer. Not an infinite number of computers. Clearly 1 does not equal infinity. Edited September 26, 2011 by The Light Barrier
Phi for All Posted September 26, 2011 Posted September 26, 2011 Now that I look at it, I think he just googled some kind of complex number thing but he doesn't know how it works. Literally, he might just be trying to make him/herself look smart. ! Moderator Note Please refrain from attacking another member's credibility. It is always enough to disprove a claim in science. You don't need to make it personal.
Realitycheck Posted September 26, 2011 Posted September 26, 2011 Then ... what's the square root of -1?
The Light Barrier Posted September 27, 2011 Author Posted September 27, 2011 i always thought that the square root of -1 was 3600.......but i "may" be wrong.... Then ... what's the square root of -1?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now