Tachyonic neutrino's

[Mystery111]

I said the existence of these particles four years ago. Today, only the most prominent papers which speculate their existences are coming to light...

 

 

http://www.stardrive.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5377:a-1997-paper-published-on-cornells-aixvorg-neutrinos-must-be-tachyons&catid=43:science&Itemid=82

 

 

This is not a matter of relativity being wrong, but is rather a methodology of bad science.

[mansamusa]

how so?

[Moontanman]

I said the existence of these particles four years ago. Today, only the most prominent papers which speculate their existences are coming to light...

 

 

http://www.stardrive.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5377:a-1997-paper-published-on-cornells-aixvorg-neutrinos-must-be-tachyons&catid=43:science&Itemid=82

 

 

This is not a matter of relativity being wrong, but is rather a methodology of bad science.

 

 

Your link is a 404 error...