questionposter Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 (edited) For some reason there's a lot more matter than anti-matter. Because there's more matter than anti-matter and it is not proven that there was a being in the creation of the universe to tamper with matter, it is the nature of the universe itself to be inherently anti-symmetrical. This is essentially just the hypothesis for the hypothesis. The way I think there is more matter than anti matter is because of how the constituents of matter work together in an absolute value or modular way. Whatever the particle or thing is that creates matter, it adds up in an anti-symmetrical way. Matter and matter are made form the same thing, however it must be easier to add up one amount more than the other. I picture it working sort of like imaginary number's work. Imagine these unknown particles as spinning transparent spheres. When they start out, they are all spinning counterclockwise. When I add two together, it generates another counter-clockwise sphere. But, when I add three sphere's together, it generates a clock-wise spinning sphere and when I add 4 it generates a counterclockwise sphere again, so the reason anti-matter doesn't occur a lot is because it's just harder for the constituents of matter to create, much like how technetium just doesn't naturally form because that's just how nuclei add up when they are fused, they add up in specific ways with a starting process. It takes more energy, more movement, more change, to create anti-matter. So I think if we discover an unknown particle and find that it generates matter and anti-matter at different energy levels, the mathematics of it would be this modular theory. I realize this is a lot less exciting then figuring out how to travel faster than light, but this is more realistic, real science is slow and you need to have many small ideas to make a bigger one. If you don't like to think of it that way, think of it like absolute value. If I add up 2 + 2 I get 4. And, if I add up abs(-2) + abs(-2), I still get 4. Or think of it like squaring. If I square 2, I get 4, and if I square -2, I still get positive 4 even though -2 is a different number than 2. Edited October 19, 2011 by questionposter
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now